» Articles » PMID: 26344164

Formation and Disruption of Tonotopy in a Large-scale Model of the Auditory Cortex

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2015 Sep 8
PMID 26344164
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is ample experimental evidence describing changes of tonotopic organisation in the auditory cortex due to environmental factors. In order to uncover the underlying mechanisms, we designed a large-scale computational model of the auditory cortex. The model has up to 100 000 Izhikevich's spiking neurons of 17 different types, almost 21 million synapses, which are evolved according to Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP) and have an architecture akin to existing observations. Validation of the model revealed alternating synchronised/desynchronised states and different modes of oscillatory activity. We provide insight into these phenomena via analysing the activity of neuronal subtypes and testing different causal interventions into the simulation. Our model is able to produce experimental predictions on a cell type basis. To study the influence of environmental factors on the tonotopy, different types of auditory stimulations during the evolution of the network were modelled and compared. We found that strong white noise resulted in completely disrupted tonotopy, which is consistent with in vivo experimental observations. Stimulation with pure tones or spontaneous activity led to a similar degree of tonotopy as in the initial state of the network. Interestingly, weak white noise led to a substantial increase in tonotopy. As the STDP was the only mechanism of plasticity in our model, our results suggest that STDP is a sufficient condition for the emergence and disruption of tonotopy under various types of stimuli. The presented large-scale model of the auditory cortex and the core simulator, SUSNOIMAC, have been made publicly available.

Citing Articles

Neurod1 Is Essential for the Primary Tonotopic Organization and Related Auditory Information Processing in the Midbrain.

Macova I, Pysanenko K, Chumak T, Dvorakova M, Bohuslavova R, Syka J J Neurosci. 2018; 39(6):984-1004.

PMID: 30541910 PMC: 6363931. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-18.2018.

References
1.
Holmgren C, Harkany T, Svennenfors B, Zilberter Y . Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex. J Physiol. 2003; 551(Pt 1):139-53. PMC: 2343144. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044784. View

2.
Froemke R, Jones B . Development of auditory cortical synaptic receptive fields. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35(10):2105-13. PMC: 3133871. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.006. View

3.
Buonomano D, Maass W . State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(2):113-25. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2558. View

4.
Levy R, Reyes A . Spatial profile of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connectivity in mouse primary auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(16):5609-19. PMC: 3359703. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5158-11.2012. View

5.
Li L, Ji X, Liang F, Li Y, Xiao Z, Tao H . A feedforward inhibitory circuit mediates lateral refinement of sensory representation in upper layer 2/3 of mouse primary auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(41):13670-83. PMC: 4188965. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1516-14.2014. View