» Articles » PMID: 26343192

Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 8
PMID 26343192
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young children, people with underlying disease and the elderly, along with occupational groups such a healthcare workers and farm workers. There are two main types of vaccines available: the parenteral inactivated influenza vaccine and the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine. The inactivated vaccines are licensed from 6 months of age and have been used for more than 50 years with a good safety profile. Inactivated vaccines are standardized according to the presence of the viral major surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin and protection is mediated by the induction of vaccine strain specific antibody responses. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccines are licensed in Europe for children from 2-17 years of age and provide a multifaceted immune response with local and systemic antibody and T cell responses but with no clear correlate of protection. Here we discuss the immunological immune responses elicited by the two vaccines and discuss future work to better define correlates of protection.

Citing Articles

Integrative Mapping of Pre-existing Immune Landscapes for Vaccine Response Prediction.

Hao S, Tomic I, Lindsey B, Jagne Y, Hoschler K, Meijer A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896552 PMC: 11785181. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.22.634302.


A Study on the Induction of Multi-Type Immune Responses in Mice via an mRNA Vaccine Based on Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Antigen.

Liu M, Liu Y, Song S, Qiao Q, Liu J, Xie Y Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852870 PMC: 11769188. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13010091.


Truncated NS1 Influenza A Virus Induces a Robust Antigen-Specific Tissue-Resident T-Cell Response and Promotes Inducible Bronchus-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Formation in Mice.

Shurygina A, Shuklina M, Ozhereleva O, Romanovskaya-Romanko E, Kovaleva S, Egorov A Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852837 PMC: 11769193. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13010058.


Approaches to Enhance the Potency of Vaccines in Chickens.

Bodman-Harris O, Rollier C, Iqbal M Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39771998 PMC: 11680195. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121337.


Next-generation vaccines for influenza B virus: advancements and challenges.

Ashraf M, Asif Raza M, Imran A, Amjad M Arch Virol. 2025; 170(2):25.

PMID: 39762648 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-024-06210-4.


References
1.
Clark A, POTTER C, Jennings R, Nicholl J, Langrick A, Schild G . A comparison of live and inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccines. 1. Short-term immunity. J Hyg (Lond). 1983; 90(3):351-9. PMC: 2134273. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400028989. View

2.
Belshe R, Edwards K, Vesikari T, Black S, Walker R, Hultquist M . Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(7):685-96. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065368. View

3.
Kohlmeier J, Cookenham T, Miller S, Roberts A, Christensen J, Thomsen A . CXCR3 directs antigen-specific effector CD4+ T cell migration to the lung during parainfluenza virus infection. J Immunol. 2009; 183(7):4378-84. PMC: 2757292. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902022. View

4.
Belshe R, Lee M, Walker R, Stoddard J, Mendelman P . Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of intranasal, live attenuated influenza vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2004; 3(6):643-54. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.3.6.643. View

5.
Cox R, Haaheim L . The effect of age and natural priming on the IgG and IgA subclass responses after parenteral influenza vaccination. J Infect Dis. 1999; 180(4):1356-60. DOI: 10.1086/315003. View