Global Occurrence of Torque Teno Virus in Water Systems
Overview
Public Health
Affiliations
Bacterial indicator organisms are used globally to assess the microbiological safety of waters. However, waterborne viral outbreaks have occurred in drinking water systems despite negative bacterial results. Using viral markers may therefore provide more accurate health risk assessment data. In this study, fecal, wastewater, stormwater, surface water (fresh and salt), groundwater, and drinking water samples were analyzed for the presence or concentration of traditional indicators, innovative indicators and viral markers. Samples were obtained in the United States, Italy, and Australia and results compared to those reported for studies conducted in Asia and South America as well. Indicators included total coliforms, Escherichia coli, enterococci, male-specific coliphages, somatic coliphages and microviradae. Viral markers included adenovirus, polyomavirus, and a potential new surrogate, Torque teno virus (TTV). TTV was more frequently found in wastewaters (38-100%) and waters influenced by waste discharges (25%) than in surface waters used as drinking water sources (5%). TTV was also specific to human rather than animal feces. While TTV numbers were strongly correlated to other viral markers in wastewaters, suggesting its utility as a fecal contamination marker, data limitations and TTV presence in treated drinking waters demonstrates that additional research is needed on this potential viral indicator.
Deep viral blood metagenomics reveals extensive anellovirus diversity in healthy humans.
Cebria-Mendoza M, Arbona C, Larrea L, Diaz W, Arnau V, Pena C Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):6921.
PMID: 33767340 PMC: 7994813. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86427-4.
Torque teno virus in liver diseases: On the way towards unity of view.
Reshetnyak V, Maev I, Burmistrov A, Chekmazov I, Karlovich T World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(15):1691-1707.
PMID: 32351287 PMC: 7183866. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i15.1691.
Possible risks posed by single-stranded DNA viruses of pigs associated with xenotransplantation.
Karuppannan A, Opriessnig T Xenotransplantation. 2018; 25(4):e12453.
PMID: 30264878 PMC: 6120555. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12453.
Jones T, Brassard J, Topp E, Wilkes G, Lapen D Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 83(3).
PMID: 27836843 PMC: 5244300. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02763-16.