Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being

Overview

Journal Soc Indic Res

Date 2015 Aug 29

PMID 26316674

Citations 34

Authors

Arie Kapteyn

Jinkook Lee

Caroline Tassot

Hana Vonkova

Gema Zamarro

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We use two waves of a population based survey (the RAND American Life Panel) to investigate the relations between various evaluative and experienced well-being measures based on the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Gallup Wellbeing Index, and a 12-item hedonic well-being module of the Health and Retirement Study. In a randomized set-up we administered several versions of the survey with different response scales. Using factor analysis, we find that all evaluative measures load on the same factor, but the positive and negative experienced affect measures load on different factors. We find evidence of an effect of response scales on both the estimated number of underlying factors and their relations with demographics. We conclude that finer response scales allowing more nuanced answers offer more reliability. The relation of evaluative and experienced measures with demographics are very different; perhaps the most striking aspect is the lack of a consistent relation of experienced well-being measures with income, while evaluative well-being is strongly positively related with income.

Citing Articles

Assessing the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization -five well-being index (WHO-5) in Filipino samples amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gallemit I, Mordeno I, Simon P, Ferolino M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):580.

PMID: 39427223 PMC: 11491023. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01941-0.

The Association between Music Listening at Home and Subjective Well-Being.

Shan X, Zhang Y, Deng J, Ma H, Hu X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335982 PMC: 11429110. DOI: 10.3390/bs14090767.

The effects of 7-week participation in football on personal well-being among male asylum seekers in a UK hotel.

McManus C, Jones B, Rogerson M, Butson J, Micklewright D, Sandercock G Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36992.

PMID: 39281515 PMC: 11401222. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36992.

Incomparability and Incommensurability in Choice: No Common Currency of Value?.

Walasek L, Brown G Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023; 19(6):1011-1030.

PMID: 37642131 PMC: 11539466. DOI: 10.1177/17456916231192828.

Estimating the association between Facebook adoption and well-being in 72 countries.

Vuorre M, Przybylski A R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(8):221451.

PMID: 37564066 PMC: 10410217. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221451.

References

Diener E . Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol. 2001; 55(1):34-43. View

Kim J, Moen P . Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: a life-course, ecological model. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(3):P212-22. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.3.p212. View

Kahneman D, Krueger A, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A . A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science. 2004; 306(5702):1776-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1103572. View

Schimmack U, Oishi S . The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005; 89(3):395-406. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.395. View

Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View

Kahneman D, Krueger A, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A . Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science. 2006; 312(5782):1908-10. DOI: 10.1126/science.1129688. View

Shiffman S, Stone A, Hufford M . Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 4:1-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415. View

Deaton A . Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll. J Econ Perspect. 2009; 22(2):53-72. PMC: 2680297. DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53. View

Krueger A, Schkade D . The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures. J Public Econ. 2009; 92(8-9):1833-1845. PMC: 2597879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015. View

10.

Manski C, Molinari F . Rounding Probabilistic Expectations in Surveys. J Bus Econ Stat. 2010; 28(2):219-231. PMC: 2847785. DOI: 10.1198/jbes.2009.08098. View

11.

Kahneman D, Deaton A . High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(38):16489-93. PMC: 2944762. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107. View

12.

Delavande A, Rohwedder S . Eliciting Subjective Probabilities in Internet Surveys. Public Opin Q. 2011; 72(5):866-891. PMC: 2942770. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfn062. View

13.

Fonseca R, Mullen K, Zamarro G, Zissimopoulos J . What Explains the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy? The Role of Household Decision Making. J Consum Aff. 2012; 46(1):90-106. PMC: 3462438. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01221.x. View

14.

Lucas R, Lawless N . Does life seem better on a sunny day? Examining the association between daily weather conditions and life satisfaction judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 104(5):872-84. PMC: 3695376. DOI: 10.1037/a0032124. View

15.

Deaton A, Stone A . Evaluative and hedonic wellbeing among those with and without children at home. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(4):1328-33. PMC: 3910586. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311600111. View

16.

Olsson U . On The Robustness Of Factor Analysis Against Crude Classification Of The Observations. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 14(4):485-500. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_7. View

17.

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

18.

Ryff C, Keyes C . The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 69(4):719-27. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719. View