» Articles » PMID: 26316279

Use of the Learning Conversation Improves Instructor Confidence in Life Support Training: An Open Randomised Controlled Cross-over Trial Comparing Teaching Feedback Mechanisms

Overview
Journal Resuscitation
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2015 Aug 29
PMID 26316279
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Feedback is vital for the effective delivery of skills-based education. We sought to compare the sandwich technique and learning conversation structured methods of feedback delivery in competency-based basic life support (BLS) training.

Methods: Open randomised crossover study undertaken between October 2014 and March 2015 at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Six-hundred and forty healthcare students undertaking a European Resuscitation Council (ERC) BLS course were enrolled, each of whom was randomised to receive teaching using either the sandwich technique or the learning conversation. Fifty-eight instructors were randomised to initially teach using either the learning conversation or sandwich technique, prior to crossing-over and teaching with the alternative technique after a pre-defined time period. Outcome measures included skill acquisition as measured by an end-of-course competency assessment, instructors' perception of teaching with each feedback technique and candidates' perception of the feedback they were provided with.

Results: Scores assigned to use of the learning conversation by instructors were significantly more favourable than for the sandwich technique across all but two assessed domains relating to instructor perception of the feedback technique, including all skills-based domains. No difference was seen in either assessment pass rates (80.9% sandwich technique vs. 77.2% learning conversation; OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.85-1.84; p=0.29) or any domain relating to candidates' perception of their teaching technique.

Conclusions & Relevance: This is the first direct comparison of two feedback techniques in clinical medical education using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The learning conversation is preferred by instructors providing competency-based life support training and is perceived to favour skills acquisition.

Citing Articles

The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model?.

Lin G, Tan W, Hashim H, Foong C BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):417.

PMID: 37353763 PMC: 10288793. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5.


Prompt identification of struggling candidates in near peer-led basic life support training: piloting an online performance scoring system.

Gillam L, Crawshaw B, Booker M, Allsop S BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):303.

PMID: 37131183 PMC: 10152634. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04225-0.


Development and Validation of a Novel Ultra-Compact and Cost-Effective Device for Basic Hands-On CPR Training: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Blinded Trial.

Rabanales-Sotos J, Guisado-Requena I, Leiton-Espinoza Z, Guerrero-Agenjo C, Lopez-Torres-Hidalgo J, Martin-Conty J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429945 PMC: 9690726. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215228.


Faculty Development Approaches for Life Support Courses: A Scoping Review.

Ko Y, Hsieh M, Cheng A, Lauridsen K, Sawyer T, Bhanji F J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(11):e025661.

PMID: 35656992 PMC: 9238697. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025661.


Effect of face-to-face verbal feedback compared with no or alternative feedback on the objective workplace task performance of health professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Johnson C, Weerasuria M, Keating J BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e030672.

PMID: 32213515 PMC: 7170595. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030672.