» Articles » PMID: 26315712

Attitudes of Physicians Toward Assessing Risk and Using Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor As Primary Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Associated with an Intermediate Risk of Febrile Neutropenia

Overview
Journal Med Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Aug 29
PMID 26315712
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Baseline Risk Factors on the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Li E, Schroader B, Campbell D, Campbell K, Wang W J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022; 8(1):106-115.

PMID: 35127962 PMC: 8787317. DOI: 10.36469/001c.24564.


G-CSF guideline adherence in Germany, an update with a retrospective and representative sample survey.

Link H, Kerkmann M, Holtmann L, Ortner P Support Care Cancer. 2018; 27(4):1459-1469.

PMID: 30374765 PMC: 6394812. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4481-x.


Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Van Ryckeghem F, Haverbeke C, Wynendaele W, Jerusalem G, Somers L, Van Den Broeck A Support Care Cancer. 2018; 27(3):1099-1108.

PMID: 30099601 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4399-3.

References
1.
Madarnas Y, Dent S, Husain S, Robinson A, Alkhayyat S, Hopman W . Real-world experience with adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centres. Curr Oncol. 2011; 18(3):119-25. PMC: 3108865. DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i3.751. View

2.
Schelenz S, Giles D, Abdallah S . Epidemiology, management and economic impact of febrile neutropenia in oncology patients receiving routine care at a regional UK cancer centre. Ann Oncol. 2011; 23(7):1889-93. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr520. View

3.
Cooper K, Madan J, Whyte S, Stevenson M, Akehurst R . Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11:404. PMC: 3203098. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-404. View

4.
Viscoli C, Varnier O, Machetti M . Infections in patients with febrile neutropenia: epidemiology, microbiology, and risk stratification. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40 Suppl 4:S240-5. DOI: 10.1086/427329. View

5.
. Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(3):602-11. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.602. View