» Articles » PMID: 26314746

The Use of Augmented Auditory Feedback to Improve Arm Reaching in Stroke: a Case Series

Overview
Journal Disabil Rehabil
Date 2015 Aug 29
PMID 26314746
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: After practice, augmented feedback is the most important factor that facilitates motor learning. We assess the potential effectiveness of two types of augmented auditory feedback on the re-learning of arm reaching in individuals with stroke: (a) real-time knowledge of performance (KP) feedback and (b) rhythmic cueing in the form of knowledge of results (KR) feedback.

Method: Five participants with stroke underwent short-term practice, reaching with their affected arm with KP, KR and no feedback, on separate days. We assessed range of motion of the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow) and trunk, mean error and variability of the performed trajectory, and movement time, before and after training.

Results: All participants benefitted from practice with feedback, though the effects varied across participants and feedback type. In three participants, KP feedback increased elbow extension and reduced compensatory trunk flexion. In four participants, KR feedback reduced movement time taken to perform the reach. Of note, one participant benefitted mostly from KP feedback, which increased shoulder flexion and elbow extension, and decreased compensatory trunk flexion and mean error.

Conclusions: Within day practice with augmented auditory feedback improves reaching in individuals with stroke. This warrants further investigation with longer practice periods in a larger sample size.

Implications For Rehabilitation: After practice, augmented feedback is the second most important factor that facilitates motor learning. Music-based augmented auditory feedback has potential to enhance reaching abilities in individuals with stroke. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this feedback over a longer training period in a larger sample size.

Citing Articles

The Use of Extrinsic Performance Feedback and Reward to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Behavior and Recovery Post-Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Palidis D, Gardiner Z, Stephenson A, Zhang K, Boruff J, Fellows L Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024; 39(2):157-173.

PMID: 39659261 PMC: 11849245. DOI: 10.1177/15459683241298262.


Mitigating Trunk Compensatory Movements in Post-Stroke Survivors through Visual Feedback during Robotic-Assisted Arm Reaching Exercises.

Lee S, Song W Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(11).

PMID: 38894119 PMC: 11174622. DOI: 10.3390/s24113331.


Extrinsic feedback facilitates mental chronometry abilities in stroke patients.

Stuerner J, Sehle A, Liepert J NeuroRehabilitation. 2023; 53(3):347-354.

PMID: 37927280 PMC: 10741321. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-230093.


Somesthetic, Visual, and Auditory Feedback and Their Interactions Applied to Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Technology: A Narrative Review to Facilitate Contextualization of Knowledge.

Proulx C, Louis Jean M, Higgins J, Gagnon D, Dancause N Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:789479.

PMID: 36188924 PMC: 9397809. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.789479.


Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.

Reh J, Schmitz G, Hwang T, Effenberg A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):586.

PMID: 35715757 PMC: 9206330. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05503-6.


References
1.
Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver K, Macko R . Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000; 31(10):2390-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.10.2390. View

2.
Gladstone D, Danells C, Black S . The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002; 16(3):232-40. DOI: 10.1177/154596802401105171. View

3.
Repp B, Penel A . Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28(5):1085-99. View

4.
Kwakkel G, Kollen B, van der Grond J, Prevo A . Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34(9):2181-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD. View

5.
Bangert M, Altenmuller E . Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neurosci. 2003; 4:26. PMC: 270043. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-4-26. View