The Efficacy of Different Doses of Midazolam Added to Lidocaine for Upper Extremity Bier Block on the Sensory and Motor Block Characteristics and Postoperative Pain
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different doses of midazolam on anesthesia and analgesia quality when added to lidocaine during the intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).
Methods: One hundred and forty patients underwent hand surgery were randomly allocated into four groups to receive 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the control Group L-C (n = 35), 30 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M1 (n = 35), 40 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M2 (n = 35), and 50 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M3 (n = 35). Sensory and motor block and recovery times, tourniquet pain, intra-operative analgesic requirement, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded.
Findings: Onset time of sensory and motor block in L-M3 Group was shorter than the L-M2 and L-M1 and L-C Groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, prolonged sensory (P = 0.005) and motor recovery time (P = 0.001) in L-M3 were longer than the other groups. Intra-operative VAS score and intra-operative fentanyl consumption in L-M3 were lower than the other groups (P < 0.001). The numbers of patients needed to pethidine in Group L-M3 were significantly less compared with the other groups (P = 0.035). VAS scores were significantly lower in Group L-M3 in different time intervals in the postoperative period compared with the other groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Addition of 50 μg/kg midazolam for IVRA (Group L-M3) enhanced intra-operative analgesia and improved anesthesia quality better than other groups receiving lower midazolam doses as well as a control group.
Sagiroglu G, Baysal A Ann Saudi Med. 2020; 40(3):175-182.
PMID: 32493052 PMC: 7270617. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.175.
Gupta B, Verma R, Kumar S, Chaudhary G Anesth Essays Res. 2017; 11(1):62-66.
PMID: 28298758 PMC: 5341646. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.200245.
Simple Arm Tourniquet as an Adjunct to Double-Cuff Tourniquet in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia.
Jafarian A, Imani F, Salehi R, Mazaher F, Moini F Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 6(3):e29316.
PMID: 27635387 PMC: 5013696. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.29316.