» Articles » PMID: 26312256

The Efficacy of Different Doses of Midazolam Added to Lidocaine for Upper Extremity Bier Block on the Sensory and Motor Block Characteristics and Postoperative Pain

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 28
PMID 26312256
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different doses of midazolam on anesthesia and analgesia quality when added to lidocaine during the intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).

Methods: One hundred and forty patients underwent hand surgery were randomly allocated into four groups to receive 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the control Group L-C (n = 35), 30 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M1 (n = 35), 40 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg 2% lidocaine diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M2 (n = 35), and 50 μg/kg midazolam plus 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 mL in the midazolam Group L-M3 (n = 35). Sensory and motor block and recovery times, tourniquet pain, intra-operative analgesic requirement, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded.

Findings: Onset time of sensory and motor block in L-M3 Group was shorter than the L-M2 and L-M1 and L-C Groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, prolonged sensory (P = 0.005) and motor recovery time (P = 0.001) in L-M3 were longer than the other groups. Intra-operative VAS score and intra-operative fentanyl consumption in L-M3 were lower than the other groups (P < 0.001). The numbers of patients needed to pethidine in Group L-M3 were significantly less compared with the other groups (P = 0.035). VAS scores were significantly lower in Group L-M3 in different time intervals in the postoperative period compared with the other groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Addition of 50 μg/kg midazolam for IVRA (Group L-M3) enhanced intra-operative analgesia and improved anesthesia quality better than other groups receiving lower midazolam doses as well as a control group.

Citing Articles

Continuous intravenous versus intermittent bolus midazolam with remifentanil during arteriovenous fistula placement with monitored anesthesia care in chronic renal failure patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Sagiroglu G, Baysal A Ann Saudi Med. 2020; 40(3):175-182.

PMID: 32493052 PMC: 7270617. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.175.


Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as Adjuncts to Lignocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia.

Gupta B, Verma R, Kumar S, Chaudhary G Anesth Essays Res. 2017; 11(1):62-66.

PMID: 28298758 PMC: 5341646. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.200245.


Simple Arm Tourniquet as an Adjunct to Double-Cuff Tourniquet in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia.

Jafarian A, Imani F, Salehi R, Mazaher F, Moini F Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 6(3):e29316.

PMID: 27635387 PMC: 5013696. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.29316.

References
1.
Rosenberg P . 1992 ASRA Lecture. Intravenous regional anesthesia: nerve block by multiple mechanisms. Reg Anesth. 1993; 18(1):1-5. View

2.
Brown E, McGriff J, Malinowski R . Intravenous regional anaesthesia (Bier block): review of 20 years' experience. Can J Anaesth. 1989; 36(3 Pt 1):307-10. DOI: 10.1007/BF03010770. View

3.
Ben-David B, Katz E, Gaitini L, Goldik Z . Comparison of i.m. and local infiltration of ketorolac with and without local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 1995; 75(4):409-12. DOI: 10.1093/bja/75.4.409. View

4.
Malan T, Mata H, Porreca F . Spinal GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor pharmacology in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96(5):1161-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00020. View

5.
Bazzichi L, Betti L, Giannaccini G, Rossi A, Lucacchini A . Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptors in human mononuclear cells of patients affected by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasic arthritis. Clin Biochem. 2003; 36(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(02)00408-3. View