» Articles » PMID: 26311752

Predicting Frequent ED Use by People with Epilepsy with Health Information Exchange Data

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Aug 28
PMID 26311752
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To describe (1) the predictability of frequent emergency department (ED) use (a marker of inadequate disease control and/or poor access to care), and (2) the demographics, comorbidities, and use of health services of frequent ED users, among people with epilepsy.

Methods: We obtained demographics, comorbidities, and 2 years of encounter data for 8,041 people with epilepsy from a health information exchange in New York City. Using a retrospective cohort design, we explored bivariate relationships between baseline characteristics (year 1) and subsequent frequent ED use (year 2). We then built, evaluated, and compared predictive models to identify frequent ED users (≥4 visits year 2), using multiple techniques (logistic regression, lasso, elastic net, CART [classification and regression trees], Random Forests, AdaBoost, support vector machines). We selected a final model based on performance and simplicity.

Results: People with epilepsy who, in year 1, were adults (rather than children or seniors), male, Manhattan residents, frequent users of health services, users of multiple health systems, or had medical, neurologic, or psychiatric comorbidities, were more likely to frequently use the ED in year 2. Predictive techniques identified frequent ED visitors with good positive predictive value (approximately 70%) but poor sensitivity (approximately 20%). A simple strategy, selecting individuals with 11+ ED visits in year 1, performed as well as more sophisticated models.

Conclusions: People with epilepsy with 11+ ED visits in a year are at highest risk of continued frequent ED use and may benefit from targeted intervention to avoid preventable ED visits. Future work should focus on improving the sensitivity of predictions.

Citing Articles

Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.

Reid F, Pravinkumar S, Maguire R, Main A, McCartney H, Winters L Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251315293.

PMID: 40035039 PMC: 11873922. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251315293.


Artificial Intelligence Models in Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications.

Borna S, Maniaci M, Haider C, Maita K, Torres-Guzman R, Avila F Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(18).

PMID: 37761781 PMC: 10531020. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182584.


Disparities in adherence and emergency department utilization among people with epilepsy: A machine learning approach.

Bensken W, Vaca G, Williams S, Khan O, Jobst B, Stange K Seizure. 2023; 110:169-176.

PMID: 37393863 PMC: 10528555. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.021.


Machine learning to improve frequent emergency department use prediction: a retrospective cohort study.

Chiu Y, Courteau J, Dufour I, Vanasse A, Hudon C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1981.

PMID: 36737625 PMC: 9898278. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27568-6.


Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy.

Patel A, Debs A, Terry D, Parker W, Burch M, Luciano D Neurol Clin Pract. 2021; 11(5):413-419.

PMID: 34840868 PMC: 8610546. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001109.


References
1.
LaCalle E, Rabin E . Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56(1):42-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. View

2.
Weissman J, Gatsonis C, Epstein A . Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992; 268(17):2388-94. View

3.
Katz E, Carrier E, Umscheid C, Pines J . Comparative effectiveness of care coordination interventions in the emergency department: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60(1):12-23.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.025. View

4.
Bardsley M, Blunt I, Davies S, Dixon J . Is secondary preventive care improving? Observational study of 10-year trends in emergency admissions for conditions amenable to ambulatory care. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(1). PMC: 3549201. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002007. View

5.
Oster A, Bindman A . Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: insights into preventable hospitalizations. Med Care. 2003; 41(2):198-207. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000045021.70297.9F. View