» Articles » PMID: 26310439

Modulation of Receptor Dynamics by the Regulator of G Protein Signaling Sst2

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Cell
Date 2015 Aug 28
PMID 26310439
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is fundamental to physiological processes such as vision, the immune response, and wound healing. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, GPCRs detect and respond to gradients of pheromone during mating. After pheromone stimulation, the GPCR Ste2 is removed from the cell membrane, and new receptors are delivered to the growing edge. The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein Sst2 acts by accelerating GTP hydrolysis and facilitating pathway desensitization. Sst2 is also known to interact with the receptor Ste2. Here we show that Sst2 is required for proper receptor recovery at the growing edge of pheromone-stimulated cells. Mathematical modeling suggested pheromone-induced synthesis of Sst2 together with its interaction with the receptor function to reestablish a receptor pool at the site of polarized growth. To validate the model, we used targeted genetic perturbations to selectively disrupt key properties of Sst2 and its induction by pheromone. Together our results reveal that a regulator of G protein signaling can also regulate the G protein-coupled receptor. Whereas Sst2 negatively regulates G protein signaling, it acts in a positive manner to promote receptor retention at the growing edge.

Citing Articles

Design patterns of biological cells.

Andrews S, Wiley H, Sauro H Bioessays. 2024; 46(3):e2300188.

PMID: 38247191 PMC: 10922931. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300188.


Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.

Ghose D, Elston T, Lew D Annu Rev Biophys. 2022; 51:431-451.

PMID: 35130037 PMC: 9549416. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-110821-071250.


A systems approach to investigate GPCR-mediated Ras signaling network in chemoattractant sensing.

Xu X, Quan W, Zhang F, Jin T Mol Biol Cell. 2021; 33(3):ar23.

PMID: 34910560 PMC: 9250378. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-08-0545.


A predictive model of gene expression reveals the role of network motifs in the mating response of yeast.

Pomeroy A, Pena M, Houser J, Dixit G, Dohlman H, Elston T Sci Signal. 2021; 14(670).

PMID: 33593998 PMC: 8193838. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.abb5235.


Quantitative analysis of the yeast pheromone pathway.

Shellhammer J, Pomeroy A, Li Y, Dujmusic L, Elston T, Hao N Yeast. 2019; 36(8):495-518.

PMID: 31022772 PMC: 6684483. DOI: 10.1002/yea.3395.


References
1.
Sprang S . G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997; 66:639-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.639. View

2.
Howell A, Jin M, Wu C, Zyla T, Elston T, Lew D . Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell. 2012; 149(2):322-33. PMC: 3680131. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012. View

3.
Apanovitch D, Slep K, SIGLER P, Dohlman H . Sst2 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gpa1: purification and characterization of a cognate RGS-Galpha protein pair in yeast. Biochemistry. 1998; 37(14):4815-22. DOI: 10.1021/bi9729965. View

4.
Dyer J, Savage N, Jin M, Zyla T, Elston T, Lew D . Tracking shallow chemical gradients by actin-driven wandering of the polarization site. Curr Biol. 2012; 23(1):32-41. PMC: 3543483. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.014. View

5.
Surve C, Lehmann D, Smrcka A . A chemical biology approach demonstrates G protein βγ subunits are sufficient to mediate directional neutrophil chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289(25):17791-801. PMC: 4067212. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.576827. View