Evaluation of the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Novel Method for Estimating the Number of Retinal Ganglion Cells in the Human Retina

Overview

Journal Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2015 Aug 26

PMID 26305526

Citations 35

Authors

Ali S Raza

Donald C Hood

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a simple method for estimating the number of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the human retina using optical coherence tomography (OCT), compared it to a previous approach, and demonstrated its potential for furthering our understanding of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.

Methods: Swept-source (ss) OCT data and 10-2 visual fields (VFs) were obtained from 43 eyes of 36 healthy controls, and 50 eyes of 50 glaucoma patients and suspects. Using estimates of RGC density from the literature and relatively few assumptions, estimates of the number of RGCs in the macula were obtained based on ssOCT-derived RGC layer thickness measurements.

Results: The RGC estimates were in general agreement with previously published values derived from histology, whereas a prior method based on VF sensitivity did not agree as well with histological data and had significantly higher (P = 0.001) and more variable (P < 0.001) RGC estimates than the new method based on ssOCT. However, the RGC estimates of the new approach were not zero for extreme VF losses, suggesting that a residual, non-RGC contribution needs to be added. Finally, the new ssOCT-derived RGC estimates were significantly (P < 0.001 to P = 0.018) related to VF sensitivity (Spearman's ρ = 0.26-0.47), and, in contrast to claims made in prior studies, statistically significant RGC loss did not occur more often than statistically significant visual loss.

Conclusions: The novel method for estimating RGCs yields values that are closer to histological estimates than prior methods, while relying on considerably fewer assumptions. Although the value added for clinical applications is yet to be determined, this approach is useful for assessing the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.

Citing Articles

Spatially Localized Visual Perception Estimation by Means of Prosthetic Vision Simulation.

Villarreal D, Krautschneider W J Imaging. 2024; 10(11).

PMID: 39590758 PMC: 11595353. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10110294.

The relationship between ON-OFF function and OCT structural and angiographic parameters in early diabetic retinal disease.

Tang V, Symons R, Fourlanos S, Guest D, McKendrick A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(1):77-88.

PMID: 39400905 PMC: 11629852. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13394.

Impact of Glaucomatous Ganglion Cell Damage on Central Visual Function.

Kwon M Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2024; 10(1):425-453.

PMID: 39292555 PMC: 11529636. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-110223-123044.

Retinal Ganglion Cell Content Underlying Standard Automated Perimetry Size I to V Visual Sensitivities in the Non-Human Primate Experimental Glaucoma Model.

Venkata Srinivasan V, Carter-Dawson L, Patel N Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(8):22.

PMID: 38995114 PMC: 11246096. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.22.

Spatial Summation in the Glaucomatous Macula: A Link With Retinal Ganglion Cell Damage.

Montesano G, Redmond T, Mulholland P, Garway-Heath D, Ometto G, Romano D Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(14):36.

PMID: 38010697 PMC: 10683773. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.36.

References

Budenz D, Rhee P, Feuer W, McSoley J, Johnson C, Anderson D . Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109(6):1052-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01047-3. View

Drasdo N, Millican C, Katholi C, Curcio C . The length of Henle fibers in the human retina and a model of ganglion receptive field density in the visual field. Vision Res. 2007; 47(22):2901-11. PMC: 2077907. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.007. View

Quigley H, Pease M, Kerrigan D, Mitchell R . Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(3):741-8. View

Gellrich M, Gellrich N . Quantitative relations in the retinal ganglion cell layer of the rat: neurons, glia and capillaries before and after optic nerve section. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996; 234(5):315-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00220707. View

Neufeld A . Microglia in the optic nerve head and the region of parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117(8):1050-6. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.8.1050. View

Moura A, Raza A, Lazow M, De Moraes C, Hood D . Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in regions of severe visual field sensitivity loss in patients with glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26(9):1188-93. PMC: 3443822. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.110. View

Harwerth R, Wheat J, Fredette M, Anderson D . Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010; 29(4):249-71. PMC: 2878911. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.02.001. View

Srinivasan V, Huber R, Gorczynska I, Fujimoto J, Jiang J, Reisen P . High-speed, high-resolution optical coherence tomography retinal imaging with a frequency-swept laser at 850 nm. Opt Lett. 2007; 32(4):361-3. DOI: 10.1364/ol.32.000361. View

Harwerth R, Vilupuru A, Rangaswamy N, Smith 3rd E . The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(2):763-73. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0688. View

10.

BUSSOW H . The astrocytes in the retina and optic nerve head of mammals: a special glia for the ganglion cell axons. Cell Tissue Res. 1980; 206(3):367-78. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237966. View

11.

Swanson W, Felius J, Pan F . Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45(2):466-72. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0374. View

12.

Denniss J, Turpin A, Tanabe F, Matsumoto C, McKendrick A . Structure-function mapping: variability and conviction in tracing retinal nerve fiber bundles and comparison to a computational model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(2):728-36. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13142. View

13.

Pan F, Swanson W, Dul M . Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: an approach to reduce test-retest variability. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83(7):499-511. PMC: 1808334. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000225091.60457.f4. View

14.

Wong J, Chen T, Shen L, Pasquale L . Macular imaging for glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a review. Semin Ophthalmol. 2012; 27(5-6):160-6. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2012.712734. View

15.

Ogden T . Nerve fiber layer of the primate retina: thickness and glial content. Vision Res. 1983; 23(6):581-7. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90063-9. View

16.

Ishikawa H, Stein D, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto J, Schuman J . Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46(6):2012-7. PMC: 1939723. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0335. View

17.

Balazsi A, Rootman J, Drance S, Schulzer M, Douglas G . The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984; 97(6):760-6. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90509-9. View

18.

Drasdo N, Mortlock K, North R . Ganglion cell loss and dysfunction: relationship to perimetric sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(11):1036-42. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b94af. View

19.

Wheat J, Rangaswamy N, Harwerth R . Correlating RNFL thickness by OCT with perimetric sensitivity in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2011; 21(2):95-101. PMC: 3636548. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820bcfbe. View

20.

Almasieh M, Wilson A, Morquette B, Cueva Vargas J, Di Polo A . The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011; 31(2):152-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002. View