The Femoral Neck-shaft Angle on Plain Radiographs: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Skeletal Radiol

Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology

Date 2015 Aug 26

PMID 26305058

Citations 42

Authors

Christoph Kolja Boese

Jens Dargel

Johannes Oppermann

Peer Eysel

Max Joseph Scheyerer

Jan Bredow

Philipp Lechler

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is an important measure for the assessment of the anatomy of the hip and planning of operations. Despite its common use, there remains disagreement concerning the method of measurement and the correction of hip rotation and femoral version of the projected NSA on conventional radiographs. We addressed the following questions: (1) What are the reported values for NSA in normal adult subjects and in osteoarthritis? (2) Is there a difference between non-corrected and rotation-corrected measurements? (3) Which methods are used for measuring the NSA on plain radiographs? (4) What could be learned from an analysis of the intra- and interobserver reliability?

Material And Methods: A systematic literature search was performed including 26 publications reporting the measurement of the NSA on conventional radiographs.

Results: The mean NSA of healthy adults (5,089 hips) was 128.8° (98-180°) and 131.5° (115-155°) in patients with osteoarthritis (1230 hips). The mean NSA was 128.5° (127-130.5°) for the rotation-corrected and 129.5° (119.6-151°) for the non-corrected measurements.

Conclusion: Our data showed a high variance of the reported neck-shaft angles. Notably, we identified the inconsistency of the published methods of measurement as a central issue. The reported effect of rotation-correction cannot be reliably verified.

Citing Articles

Etiological, clinical characteristics, and treatment of atypical femur fracture: A retrospective study.

Wang H, Zhang Z, Zhou F, Song C, Yang Z, Hou G Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41513.

PMID: 39993072 PMC: 11856966. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041513.

Varus alignment of the hip and knee 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 3 years later.

Nilsson H, Englund M, Frobell R, Lohmander L, Struglics A, Sward P J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70143.

PMID: 39759097 PMC: 11696252. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70143.

A fully automated measurement of migration percentage on ultrasound images in children with cerebral palsy.

Yousefvand R, Pham T, Le L, Andersen J, Lou E Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; .

PMID: 39674995 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03259-w.

Assessing potential factors leading to perioperative peri-implant fracture in femoral pertrochanteric fracture osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation 2: A retrospective study.

Yang J, Hsu Y, Chou Y, Tsai P, Liu C, Yu Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):943.

PMID: 39574062 PMC: 11580694. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08085-7.

Key factors for increased tip-apex distance when treating intertrochanteric fractures with InterTAN nails.

Zhu N, Wu L, Han X, Qian Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1426307.

PMID: 39553393 PMC: 11563803. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1426307.

References

Sugano N, Noble P, Kamaric E, Salama J, Ochi T, Tullos H . The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(4):711-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.8319. View

Konig G . [A practical method for the determination of the angle of antetorsion and neck-shaft angle of the femur]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1972; 110(1):76-82. View

Clark J, Freeman M, Witham D . The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 1987; 2(2):99-109. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(87)80016-5. View

Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Avella M . Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1037):20130358. PMC: 4075525. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130358. View

Grunert S, Bruckl R, Rosemeyer B . [Rippstein and Müller roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 1: Correction of the conversion table and study of the effects of positioning errors]. Radiologe. 1986; 26(6):293-304. View

Gnudi S, Sitta E, Pignotti E . Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5-year longitudinal study in post-menopausal females. Br J Radiol. 2011; 85(1016):e467-73. PMC: 3587077. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/57130600. View

Nelson D, Beck T, Wu G, Lewis C, Bassford T, Cauley J . Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 22(5):1377-88. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1349-4. View

RIPPSTEIN J . [Determination of the antetorsion of the femur neck by means of two x-ray pictures]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1955; 86(3):345-60. View

Wright D, Whyne C, Hardisty M, Kreder H, Lubovsky O . Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(9):2583-9. PMC: 3148390. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1754-1. View

10.

Husmann O, Rubin P, Leyvraz P, de Roguin B, Argenson J . Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(4):444-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90201-1. View

11.

Noble P, Alexander J, Lindahl L, Yew D, GRANBERRY W, Tullos H . The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (235):148-65. View

12.

Gilligan I, Chandraphak S, Mahakkanukrauh P . Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. J Anat. 2013; 223(2):133-51. PMC: 3724207. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12073. View

13.

Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Savolainen V, Michelsson O, Hirvensalo E . Femoral shaft medialisation and neck-shaft angle in unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2004; 28(6):347-53. PMC: 3456909. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0590-x. View

14.

Hoaglund F, LOW W . Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; (152):10-6. View

15.

Ulusoy H, Bilgici A, Kuru O, Sarica N, Arslan S, Erkorkmaz U . A new value of proximal femur geometry to evaluate hip fracture risk: true moment arm. Hip Int. 2008; 18(2):101-7. DOI: 10.1177/112070000801800206. View

16.

Boese C, Buecking B, Schwarting T, Debus F, Ruchholtz S, Bliemel C . The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(7):1405-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2663-9. View

17.

Miller F, Liang Y, Merlo M, Harcke H . Measuring anteversion and femoral neck-shaft angle in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39(2):113-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07393.x. View

18.

Reikeras O, Hoiseth A, Reigstad A, Fonstelien E . Femoral neck angles: a specimen study with special regard to bilateral differences. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982; 53(5):775-9. DOI: 10.3109/17453678208992291. View

19.

Miller F, Merlo M, Liang Y, Kupcha P, Jamison J, Harcke H . Femoral version and neck shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993; 13(3):382-8. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199305000-00021. View

20.

Fearon A, Stephens S, Cook J, Smith P, Neeman T, Cormick W . The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46(12):888-92. PMC: 3597182. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090744. View