» Articles » PMID: 26304508

Response Times to Gustatory-Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence

Overview
Journal Chem Senses
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2015 Aug 26
PMID 26304508
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A mixture of perceptually congruent gustatory and olfactory flavorants (sucrose and citral) was previously shown to be detected faster than predicted by a model of probability summation that assumes stochastically independent processing of the individual gustatory and olfactory signals. This outcome suggests substantial integration of the signals. Does substantial integration also characterize responses to mixtures of incongruent flavorants? Here, we report simple response times (RTs) to detect brief pulses of 3 possible flavorants: monosodium glutamate, MSG (gustatory: "umami" quality), citral (olfactory: citrus quality), and a mixture of MSG and citral (gustatory-olfactory). Each stimulus (and, on a fraction of trials, water) was presented orally through a computer-operated, automated flow system, and subjects were instructed to press a button as soon as they detected any of the 3 non-water stimuli. Unlike responses previously found to the congruent mixture of sucrose and citral, responses here to the incongruent mixture of MSG and citral took significantly longer (RTs were greater) and showed lower detection rates than the values predicted by probability summation. This outcome suggests that the integration of gustatory and olfactory flavor signals is less extensive when the component flavors are perceptually incongruent rather than congruent, perhaps because incongruent flavors are less familiar.

Citing Articles

Taste enhances the ability to express a preference for a congruent odor in rats.

Cai Y, Allar I, Maier J Behav Neurosci. 2024; 138(6):433-440.

PMID: 39298234 PMC: 11631660. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000605.


Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.

Stocke S, Samuelsen C J Neurosci. 2024; 44(20).

PMID: 38548337 PMC: 11097261. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0071-24.2024.


The effect of multisensory context and experience on flavor preference decisions in rats.

Hua A, Dong T, Maier J Physiol Behav. 2024; 276:114480.

PMID: 38307360 PMC: 10922607. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114480.


Multisensory integration of orally-sourced gustatory and olfactory inputs to the posterior piriform cortex in awake rats.

Idris A, Christensen B, Walker E, Maier J J Physiol. 2022; 601(1):151-169.

PMID: 36385245 PMC: 9869978. DOI: 10.1113/JP283873.


Adaptive weighting of taste and odor cues during flavor choice.

Maier J, Elliott V J Neurophysiol. 2020; 124(6):1942-1947.

PMID: 33026958 PMC: 7814898. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00506.2020.


References
1.
Stevenson R, Prescott J, Boakes R . Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem Senses. 1999; 24(6):627-35. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/24.6.627. View

2.
Brewer J, Shavit A, Shepard T, Veldhuizen M, Parikh R, Marks L . Identification of gustatory-olfactory flavor mixtures: effects of linguistic labeling. Chem Senses. 2013; 38(4):305-13. PMC: 3629875. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs142. View

3.
de Araujo I, Rolls E, Kringelbach M, McGlone F, Phillips N . Taste-olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 18(7):2059-68. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02915.x. View

4.
Cerf-Ducastel B, Murphy C . Validation of a stimulation protocol suited to the investigation of odor-taste interactions with fMRI. Physiol Behav. 2004; 81(3):389-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.12.018. View

5.
Ashkenazi A, Fritz M, Buckley J, Marks L . The Temporal Automated System for Taste Experiments (TASTE). Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004; 36(1):83-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195552. View