» Articles » PMID: 26297745

Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2015 Aug 23
PMID 26297745
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is increasing support for sharing individual-level data generated by medical and public health research. This scoping review of empirical research and conceptual literature examined stakeholders' perspectives of ethical best practices in data sharing, particularly in low- and middle-income settings. Sixty-nine empirical and conceptual articles were reviewed, of which, only five were empirical studies and eight were conceptual articles focusing on low- and middle-income settings. We conclude that support for sharing individual-level data is contingent on the development and implementation of international and local policies and processes to support ethical best practices. Further conceptual and empirical research is needed to ensure data sharing policies and processes in low- and middle-income settings are appropriately informed by stakeholders' perspectives.

Citing Articles

How do we measure the costs, benefits, and harms of sharing data from biomedical studies? A protocol for a scoping review.

Maxwell L, Shreedhar P, Krishnan A Open Res Eur. 2025; 3:151.

PMID: 39867822 PMC: 11757919. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.16063.2.


Barriers impeding research data sharing on chronic disease prevention among the older adults in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Mosha N, Ngulube P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1437543.

PMID: 39678238 PMC: 11638978. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437543.


Data as scientific currency: Challenges experienced by researchers with sharing health data in sub-Saharan Africa.

Chabilall J, Brown Q, Cengiz N, Moodley K PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(10):e0000635.

PMID: 39446843 PMC: 11500889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000635.


FAIR, ethical, and coordinated data sharing for COVID-19 response: a scoping review and cross-sectional survey of COVID-19 data sharing platforms and registries.

Maxwell L, Shreedhar P, Dauga D, McQuilton P, Terry R, Denisiuk A Lancet Digit Health. 2023; 5(10):e712-e736.

PMID: 37775189 PMC: 10552001. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00129-2.


COLLAGENE enables privacy-aware federated and collaborative genomic data analysis.

Li W, Kim M, Zhang K, Chen H, Jiang X, Harmanci A Genome Biol. 2023; 24(1):204.

PMID: 37697426 PMC: 10496350. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03039-z.


References
1.
Castellani J . Are clinical trial data shared sufficiently today? Yes. BMJ. 2013; 347:f1881. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1881. View

2.
Gotzsche P . Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it. Trials. 2011; 12:249. PMC: 3264537. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-249. View

3.
Eichler H, Petavy F, Pignatti F, Rasi G . Access to patient-level trial data--a boon to drug developers. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(17):1577-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1310771. View

4.
Mello M, Francer J, Wilenzick M, Teden P, Bierer B, Barnes M . Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(17):1651-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhle1309073. View

5.
Reidpath D, Allotey P . Data sharing in medical research: an empirical investigation. Bioethics. 2001; 15(2):125-34. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00220. View