» Articles » PMID: 26293844

Inter- and Intra-observer Variability in the Classification of Extracapsular Extension in P16 Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Nodal Metastases

Overview
Journal Oral Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Aug 22
PMID 26293844
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Discern inter- and intra-observer variability in the classification of extracapsular extension (ECE) in p16+ oropharyngeal (OP) SCC comparing pathologists' own criteria versus those of a well-defined classification system.

Methods: Five pathologists reviewed 50 digitally scanned nodal metastasis slides in three Rounds. Round One was by their own criteria as ECE present or absent, and Rounds Two and Three were with a defined ECE system: Grade 0 (no ECE), 0c (no ECE - thick capsule; no infiltration), 1 (ECE - cells beyond capsule), and 2 (soft tissue metastasis - cells in soft tissue without residual node). Round Three assessed intra-observer variability after an 8 month washout period.

Results: In Round One, all five agreed on only 48% of cases (n=24). Fleiss's Kappa value was 0.508 (95% CI: 0.357-0.644). For Rounds Two and Three, Grades 0 and 0c and Grades 1 and 2 were separately grouped as ECE absent or present. In Round Two, all five agreed on 68% of cases (n=34). Fleiss' Kappa was 0.635 (95% CI: 0.472-0.783), indicating statistically significantly better agreement. In Round Three, all five agreed on 64% of cases (n=32) giving a Fleiss's Kappa of 0.639. Pathologists agreed with their prior reads in approximately 90% of cases (average n=45.4, range n=42-49), an average intra-observer Cohen's Kappa of 0.8 (range: 0.68-0.95). Inter- and intra-observer variability rates for classification of soft tissue metastasis (ECE2) were substantially worse.

Conclusion: There is substantial inter-, and modest intra-, observer variability among head and neck pathologists for ECE in p16+ OPSCC, which is modestly improved by a defined system.

Citing Articles

International Consensus Recommendations of Diagnostic Criteria and Terminologies for Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An HN CLEAR Initiative (Update 1).

Gupta R, Fielder T, Bal M, Chiosea S, Dahlstrom J, Kakkar A Head Neck Pathol. 2025; 19(1):20.

PMID: 39918634 PMC: 11805726. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-025-01753-7.


Performance analysis of Leica Biosystems p16 monoclonal antibody in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Thavaraj S, Robinson M, Dayal S, Bowen C Diagn Pathol. 2025; 20(1):9.

PMID: 39856694 PMC: 11759444. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-025-01601-w.


Identifying primary tumor site of origin for liver metastases via a combination of handcrafted and deep learning features.

Chen C, Lu C, Viswanathan V, Maveal B, Maheshwari B, Willis J J Pathol Clin Res. 2023; 10(1):e344.

PMID: 37822044 PMC: 10766034. DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.344.


International Multi-Specialty Expert Physician Preoperative Identification of Extranodal Extension n Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients using Computed Tomography: Prospective Blinded Human Inter-Observer Performance Evaluation.

Sahin O, Kamel S, Wahid K, Dede C, Taku N, He R medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36865096 PMC: 9980252. DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.25.23286432.


Inter- and Intrarater Reliability and Agreement Among Danish Head and Neck Pathologists Assessing Extranodal Extension in Lymph Node Metastases from Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Abdel-Halim C, Rohde M, Larsen S, Green T, Ulhoi B, Woller N Head Neck Pathol. 2022; 16(4):1082-1090.

PMID: 35829862 PMC: 9729471. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-022-01468-z.


References
1.
Klozar J, Kratochvil V, Salakova M, Smahelova J, Vesela E, Hamsikova E . HPV status and regional metastasis in the prognosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 265 Suppl 1:S75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0557-9. View

2.
Cooper J, Pajak T, Forastiere A, Jacobs J, Campbell B, Saxman S . Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(19):1937-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032646. View

3.
Shi W, Kato H, Perez-Ordonez B, Pintilie M, Huang S, Hui A . Comparative prognostic value of HPV16 E6 mRNA compared with in situ hybridization for human oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(36):6213-21. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1670. View

4.
Shaw R, Lowe D, Woolgar J, Brown J, Vaughan E, Evans C . Extracapsular spread in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009; 32(6):714-22. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21244. View

5.
Ang K, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal D, Nguyen-Tan P . Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(1):24-35. PMC: 2943767. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912217. View