» Articles » PMID: 26293346

Sacrificial Adhesive Bonding: a Powerful Method for Fabrication of Glass Microchips

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Aug 22
PMID 26293346
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A new protocol for fabrication of glass microchips is addressed in this research paper. Initially, the method involves the use of an uncured SU-8 intermediate to seal two glass slides irreversibly as in conventional adhesive bonding-based approaches. Subsequently, an additional step removes the adhesive layer from the channels. This step relies on a selective development to remove the SU-8 only inside the microchannel, generating glass-like surface properties as demonstrated by specific tests. Named sacrificial adhesive layer (SAB), the protocol meets the requirements of an ideal microfabrication technique such as throughput, relatively low cost, feasibility for ultra large-scale integration (ULSI), and high adhesion strength, supporting pressures on the order of 5 MPa. Furthermore, SAB eliminates the use of high temperature, pressure, or potential, enabling the deposition of thin films for electrical or electrochemical experiments. Finally, the SAB protocol is an improvement on SU-8-based bondings described in the literature. Aspects such as substrate/resist adherence, formation of bubbles, and thermal stress were effectively solved by using simple and inexpensive alternatives.

Citing Articles

Self-aligned multi-layer X-ray absorption grating using large-area fabrication methods for X-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Pil-Ali A, Adnani S, Karim K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2508.

PMID: 36781907 PMC: 9925796. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29580-2.


Simple sacrificial-layer-free microfabrication processes for air-cavity Fresnel acoustic lenses (ACFALs) with improved focusing performance.

Tang Y, Kim E Microsyst Nanoeng. 2022; 8:75.

PMID: 35812805 PMC: 9256634. DOI: 10.1038/s41378-022-00407-w.


Perspectives in translating microfluidic devices from laboratory prototyping into scale-up production.

Cong H, Zhang N Biomicrofluidics. 2022; 16(2):021301.

PMID: 35350441 PMC: 8933055. DOI: 10.1063/5.0079045.


Self-regenerating and hybrid irreversible/reversible PDMS microfluidic devices.

Shiroma L, O Piazzetta M, Duarte-Junior G, Coltro W, Carrilho E, Gobbi A Sci Rep. 2016; 6:26032.

PMID: 27181918 PMC: 4867595. DOI: 10.1038/srep26032.

References
1.
Ren K, Zhou J, Wu H . Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Acc Chem Res. 2013; 46(11):2396-406. DOI: 10.1021/ar300314s. View

2.
Mu X, Zheng W, Sun J, Zhang W, Jiang X . Microfluidics for manipulating cells. Small. 2012; 9(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200996. View

3.
Sikanen T, Heikkila L, Tuomikoski S, Ketola R, Kostiainen R, Franssila S . Performance of SU-8 microchips as separation devices and comparison with glass microchips. Anal Chem. 2007; 79(16):6255-63. DOI: 10.1021/ac0703956. View

4.
Hosokawa K, Sato K, Ichikawa N, Maeda M . Power-free poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices for gold nanoparticle-based DNA analysis. Lab Chip. 2004; 4(3):181-5. DOI: 10.1039/b403930k. View

5.
Mogensen K, El-Ali J, Wolff A, Kutter J . Integration of polymer waveguides for optical detection in microfabricated chemical analysis systems. Appl Opt. 2003; 42(19):4072-9. DOI: 10.1364/ao.42.004072. View