» Articles » PMID: 26291686

Can We Predict Urinary Stress Incontinence by Using Demographic, Clinical, Imaging and Urodynamic Data?

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 21
PMID 26291686
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: It has been claimed that urethral hypermobility and resting urethral pressure can largely explain stress incontinence in women. In this study we tried to replicate these findings in an unselected cohort of women seen for urodynamic testing, including as many potential confounders as possible.

Study Design: This study is a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 341 women. They attended for urodynamic testing due to symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. We excluded from the analysis women with a history of previous anti-incontinence and prolapse surgery. All patients had a standardised clinical assessment, 4D transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound and multichannel urodynamic testing. Urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) was diagnosed by multichannel urodynamic testing. Its severity was subjectively graded as mild, moderate and severe. Candidate variables were: age, BMI, symptoms of prolapse, vaginal parity, significant prolapse (compartment-specific), levator avulsion, levator hiatal area, Oxford grading, midurethral mobility, maximum urethral pressure (MUP), maximum cough pressure and maximum Valsalva pressure reached.

Results: On binary logistic regression, the following parameters were statistically significant in predicting urodynamic stress incontinence: age (P=0.03), significant rectocele (P=0.02), max. abdominal pressure reached (negatively, P<0.0001), midurethral mobility (P=0.0004) and MUP (negatively, P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, accounting for multiple interdependencies, the following predictors remained significant: max. abdominal pressure reached (negatively, P<0.0001), cough pressure (P=0.006), midurethral mobility (P=0.003) and MUP (negatively, P<0.0001), giving an R(2) of 0.24.

Conclusions: Mid-urethral mobility and MUP are the main predictors of USI. Demographic and clinical data are at best weak predictors. Our results suggest the presence of major unrecognised confounders.

Citing Articles

The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound.

Dobek-Brylinska M, Wlazlak E, Wlazlak W, Krakowiak J, Wrobel A, Surkont G J Ultrason. 2025; 25(100):20250005.

PMID: 39981120 PMC: 11841739. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2025.0005.


Correlation analysis of selected anatomical and functional parameters of the urethra, assessed through ultrasound and urodynamic examinations.

Wojtowicz H, Wlazlak E, Kociszewski J, Wlazlak W, Krakowiak J, Fijolek-Wieclawek W J Ultrason. 2025; 24(99):1-7.

PMID: 39839502 PMC: 11748197. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2024.0039.


Relationship Between the PERFECT Scheme, Vaginal Manometry, and Transperineal Ultrasound in Women With and Without Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Porto D, DellAquilla A, da Silveira L, Pistelli L, Haddad J, Baracat E Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(1):177-187.

PMID: 39636465 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05970-6.


Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Model for Bothersome Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Parous Women in Southeastern China.

Wang Q, Jiang X, Li X, Que Y, Lin C Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(2):391-401.

PMID: 39585381 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05983-1.


The role of TVT position in relation to the pubic symphysis in eliminating the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and urethral funneling.

Pedraszewski P, Wlazlak E, Wlazlak W, Krzycka M, Pajak P, Surkont G J Ultrason. 2019; 19(78):207-211.

PMID: 31807326 PMC: 6856951. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2019.0031.