Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex

Overview

Journal Cereb Cortex

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Aug 20

PMID 26286916

Citations 39

Authors

Simon Kornblith

Timothy J Buschman

Earl K Miller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Exploring and exploiting a rich visual environment requires perceiving, attending, and remembering multiple objects simultaneously. Recent studies have suggested that this mental "juggling" of multiple objects may depend on oscillatory neural dynamics. We recorded local field potentials from the lateral intraparietal area, frontal eye fields, and lateral prefrontal cortex while monkeys maintained variable numbers of visual stimuli in working memory. Behavior suggested independent processing of stimuli in each hemifield. During stimulus presentation, higher-frequency power (50-100 Hz) increased with the number of stimuli (load) in the contralateral hemifield, whereas lower-frequency power (8-50 Hz) decreased with the total number of stimuli in both hemifields. During the memory delay, lower-frequency power increased with contralateral load. Load effects on higher frequencies during stimulus encoding and lower frequencies during the memory delay were stronger when neural activity also signaled the location of the stimuli. Like power, higher-frequency synchrony increased with load, but beta synchrony (16-30 Hz) showed the opposite effect, increasing when power decreased (stimulus presentation) and decreasing when power increased (memory delay). Our results suggest roles for lower-frequency oscillations in top-down processing and higher-frequency oscillations in bottom-up processing.

Citing Articles

The Problem with Time: Application of Partial Least Squares Analysis on Time-Frequency Plots to Account for Varying Time Intervals with Applied EEG Data.

Szostakiwskyj J, Cortese F, Abdul-Rhaman R, Anderson S, Warren A, Archer R Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002467 PMC: 11853174. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020135.

Sub-acute stroke demonstrates altered beta oscillation and connectivity pattern in working memory.

Mao L, Che X, Wang J, Jiang X, Zhao Y, Zou L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):212.

PMID: 39633420 PMC: 11619298. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01516-5.

The human posterior parietal cortices orthogonalize the representation of different streams of information concurrently coded in visual working memory.

Xu Y PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(11):e3002915.

PMID: 39570984 PMC: 11620661. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002915.

Distinct functions for beta and alpha bursts in gating of human working memory.

Liljefors J, Almeida R, Rane G, Lundstrom J, Herman P, Lundqvist M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8950.

PMID: 39419974 PMC: 11486900. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53257-7.

The effects of different designs of indoor biophilic greening on psychological and physiological responses and cognitive performance of office workers.

Fukumoto H, Shimoda M, Hoshino S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307934.

PMID: 39058729 PMC: 11280145. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307934.

References

Matsushima A, Tanaka M . Different neuronal computations of spatial working memory for multiple locations within versus across visual hemifields. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(16):5621-6. PMC: 6608219. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0295-14.2014. View

Lundqvist M, Herman P, Lansner A . Theta and gamma power increases and alpha/beta power decreases with memory load in an attractor network model. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 23(10):3008-20. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00029. View

Bays P, Husain M . Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science. 2008; 321(5890):851-4. PMC: 2532743. DOI: 10.1126/science.1158023. View

Salazar R, Dotson N, Bressler S, Gray C . Content-specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory. Science. 2012; 338(6110):1097-100. PMC: 4038369. DOI: 10.1126/science.1224000. View

Ikkai A, McCollough A, Vogel E . Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2010; 103(4):1963-8. PMC: 2853266. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00978.2009. View

Vogel E, Woodman G, Luck S . Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001; 27(1):92-114. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.92. View

Vogel E, McCollough A, Machizawa M . Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 2005; 438(7067):500-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature04171. View

Sawaguchi T, Goldman-Rakic P . D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex: involvement in working memory. Science. 1991; 251(4996):947-50. DOI: 10.1126/science.1825731. View

Siegel M, Donner T, Oostenveld R, Fries P, Engel A . Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention. Neuron. 2008; 60(4):709-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.010. View

10.

Womelsdorf T, Fries P, Mitra P, Desimone R . Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature. 2005; 439(7077):733-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature04258. View

11.

Saalmann Y, Pinsk M, Wang L, Li X, Kastner S . The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science. 2012; 337(6095):753-6. PMC: 3714098. DOI: 10.1126/science.1223082. View

12.

Buschman T, Miller E . Serial, covert shifts of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields and correlated with population oscillations. Neuron. 2009; 63(3):386-96. PMC: 2758537. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.020. View

13.

Lara A, Wallis J . Executive control processes underlying multi-item working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(6):876-83. PMC: 4039364. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3702. View

14.

Li C, Mazzoni P, Andersen R . Effect of reversible inactivation of macaque lateral intraparietal area on visual and memory saccades. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81(4):1827-38. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1827. View

15.

Gregoriou G, Rossi A, Ungerleider L, Desimone R . Lesions of prefrontal cortex reduce attentional modulation of neuronal responses and synchrony in V4. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(7):1003-11. PMC: 4122755. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3742. View

16.

Todd J, Marois R . Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 2004; 428(6984):751-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature02466. View

17.

Mitchell D, Cusack R . The temporal evolution of electromagnetic markers sensitive to the capacity limits of visual short-term memory. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:18. PMC: 3041245. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00018. View

18.

Howard M, Rizzuto D, Caplan J, Madsen J, Lisman J, Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R . Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(12):1369-74. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg084. View

19.

Bastos A, Vezoli J, Bosman C, Schoffelen J, Oostenveld R, Dowdall J . Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels. Neuron. 2015; 85(2):390-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.018. View

20.

Richter C, Thompson W, Bosman C, Fries P . A jackknife approach to quantifying single-trial correlation between covariance-based metrics undefined on a single-trial basis. Neuroimage. 2015; 114:57-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.040. View