» Articles » PMID: 26286263

Early Results from a Multi-component French Public-private Partnership Initiative to Improve Participation in Clinical Research - CeNGEPS: a Prospective Before-after Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Aug 20
PMID 26286263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A public-private (51/49 %) partnership was initiated in 2007 in France to improve the attractiveness of French sites in industry-sponsored international clinical trials. This initiative developed and implemented a combination of structuring actions and support actions. Here we report the assessment of the impact after 6 years on participation of French study sites in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

Methods: We performed a prospective before-after study of clinical research activities in French public hospitals to assess the impact of actions developed and implemented by CeNGEPS. The programme involved a combination of structuring actions (establishment of sites of excellence, national networks and dedicated clinical research assistants (CRAs)), support actions (tools, templates and training) and competitive budget allocation for sites or networks based on performance. The impact was assessed using the following performance criteria: 1) reduction of the delay to contract signature to ≤ 60 days for 80 % of the trial sites; 2) inclusion of ≥80 % of the planned number of patients by at least 80 % of trial sites; 3) closure of <15 % of trials sites without patients enrolled.

Results: In 2013, the median delay to contract signature was: 55 days, compared with 76 days in 2008 (27.6 % reduction), 50.5 % of all sites and 58 % of sites with a dedicated CRA included ≥80 % of the planned number of patients compared with 44.8 % in 2008 (12.7 % increase) and 21.3 % of all sites and 9 % of sites with a dedicated CRA closed with no patients included, compared with 26.4 % in 2008 (19.3 and 65.9 %, respectively).

Conclusions: These results provide evidence that it is possible to improve a country's attractiveness for industry-sponsored clinical research. The two main actions, i.e. establishing sites of excellence throughout the country with well-trained, dedicated staff and establishing a national network of clinical investigators, could be adapted to other countries in Western Europe to improve Europe's attractiveness to industry-funded trials.

References
1.
Zannad F, Pletan Y . [Difficulties with conducting clinical trials in France]. Therapie. 2001; 56(4):341-7. View

2.
McNally N, Kerrison S, Pollock A . Reforming clinical research and development in England. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):550-3. PMC: 192853. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.550. View

3.
dEnfert J, Lassale C, Prodhomme P . [Attractiveness of France for clinical trials: evaluation of laboratories and promoters]. Therapie. 2003; 58(3):283-9. DOI: 10.2515/therapie:2003045. View

4.
Courcier-Duplantier S, Bouhours P, Pinton P, Sibenaler C, Lassale C . [A survey on the position of France in international clinical research as assessed by pharmaceutical laboratories]. Therapie. 2005; 59(6):629-38. DOI: 10.2515/therapie:2004109. View

5.
. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the.... Med Etika Bioet. 2005; 9(1-2):12-9. View