» Articles » PMID: 26282829

Perception and Action Influences on Discrete and Reciprocal Bimanual Coordination

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Aug 19
PMID 26282829
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For nearly four decades bimanual coordination, "a prototype of complex motor skills" and apparent "window into the design of the brain," has been intensively studied. Past research has focused on describing and modeling the constraints that allow the production of some coordination patterns while limiting effective performance of other bimanual coordination patterns. More recently researchers have identified a coalition of perception-action constraints that hinder the effective production of bimanual skills. The result has been that given specially designed contexts where one or more of these constraints are minimized, bimanual skills once thought difficult, if not impossible, to effectively produce without very extensive practice can be executed effectively with little or no practice. The challenge is to understand how these contextual constraints interact to allow or inhibit the production of complex bimanual coordination skills. In addition, the factors affecting the stability of bimanual coordination tasks needs to be re-conceptualized in terms of perception-related constraints arising from the environmental context in which performance is conducted and action constraints resident in the neuromotor system.

Citing Articles

Goal conceptualization has distinct effects on spatial and temporal bimanual coordination after left- and right- hemisphere stroke.

Yamada M, Jacob J, Hesling J, Johnson T, Wittenberg G, Kantak S Hum Mov Sci. 2024; 94:103196.

PMID: 38402657 PMC: 10939720. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103196.


Restart errors reaction time of a two-step inhibition process account for the violation of the race model's independence in multi-effector selective stop signal task.

Marc I, Giuffrida V, Ramawat S, Fiori L, Fontana R, Bardella G Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1106298.

PMID: 36845879 PMC: 9950112. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1106298.


Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control.

Bach P, Frank C, Kunde W Psychol Res. 2022; 88(6):1790-1804.

PMID: 36515699 PMC: 11315751. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w.


Investigating the role of contextual cues and interhemispheric inhibitory mechanisms in response-selective stopping: a TMS study.

Puri R, St George R, Hinder M Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022; 23(1):84-99.

PMID: 36385251 PMC: 9925558. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01047-3.


The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk.

Wang Y, Pinto Neto O, Weinrich M, Castro R, Wright T, Kennedy D PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275997.

PMID: 36282810 PMC: 9595517. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275997.


References
1.
Buchanan J . Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 156(1):39-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1763-3. View

2.
Wilson A, Snapp-Childs W, Coats R, Bingham G . Learning a coordinated rhythmic movement with task-appropriate coordination feedback. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 205(4):513-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2388-y. View

3.
Buchanan J, Wang C . Overcoming the guidance effect in motor skill learning: feedback all the time can be beneficial. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 219(2):305-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3092-x. View

4.
Kelso J, Buchanan J, Wallace S . Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 85(2):432-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229420. View

5.
Lai Q, Shea C, Bruechert L, Little M . Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning. J Mot Behav. 2009; 34(3):299-307. DOI: 10.1080/00222890209601948. View