» Articles » PMID: 26275472

Impact of Free Glasses and a Teacher Incentive on Children's Use of Eyeglasses: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Aug 16
PMID 26275472
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the effect of free glasses combined with teacher incentives on in-school glasses wear among Chinese urban migrant children.

Design: Cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Children with visual acuity (VA) ≤6/12 in either eye owing to refractive error in 94 randomly chosen primary schools underwent randomization by school to receive free glasses, education on their use, and a teacher incentive (Intervention), or glasses prescriptions only (Control). Intervention group teachers received a tablet computer if ≥80% of children given glasses wore them during unannounced visits 6 weeks and 6 months (main outcome) after intervention.

Results: Among 4376 children, 728 (16.7%, mean age 10.9 years, 51.0% boys) met enrollment criteria and were randomly allocated, 358 (49.2%, 47 schools) to Intervention and 370 (50.8%, 47 schools) to Control. Among these, 693 children (95.2%) completed the study and underwent analysis. Spectacle wear was significantly higher at 6 months among Intervention children (Observed [main outcome]: 68.3% vs 23.9%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 11.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.91-22.5, P < .001; Self-reported: 90.6% vs 32.1%, OR = 43.7, 95% CI = 21.7-88.5, P < .001). Other predictors of observed wear at 6 months included baseline spectacle wear (P < .001), uncorrected VA <6/18 (P = .01), and parental spectacle wear (P = .02). The 6-month observed wear rate was only 41% among similar-aged children provided free glasses in our previous trial without teacher incentives.

Conclusions: Free spectacles and teacher incentives maintain classroom wear in the large majority of children needing glasses over a school year. Low wear among Control children demonstrates the need for interventions.

Citing Articles

Approaches for delivery of refractive and optical care services in community and primary care settings.

Umaefulam V, Safi S, Lingham G, Gordon I, Mueller A, Krishnam N Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD016043.

PMID: 38808577 PMC: 11134311. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016043.


The impact of spectacle correction on the well-being of children with vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error: a systematic review.

Pirindhavellie G, Yong A, Mashige K, Naidoo K, Chan V BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1575.

PMID: 37596579 PMC: 10436410. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16484-z.


Implementing interventions to promote spectacle wearing among children with refractive errors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wu L, Feng J, Zhang M Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1053206.

PMID: 36969641 PMC: 10036364. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1053206.


The prevalence and county-level socioeconomic correlates of visual impairment and glasses ownership among rural students in Western China.

Guan H, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Chen X, Xue J, Ding Y Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1069793.

PMID: 36741945 PMC: 9892754. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069793.


Impact of Teacher Incentive Intervention on Students' Vision Healthcare Uptake: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhao J, Wang H, Guan H, Du K, Zhang Y, Congdon N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36232037 PMC: 9566120. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912727.