» Articles » PMID: 26269548

Compensatory Plasticity in the Olfactory Epithelium: Age, Timing, and Reversibility

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2015 Aug 14
PMID 26269548
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Like other biological systems, olfaction responds "homeostatically" to enduring change in the stimulus environment. This adaptive mechanism, referred to as compensatory plasticity, has been studied almost exclusively in developing animals. Thus it is unknown if this phenomenon is limited to ontogenesis and irreversible, characteristics common to some other forms of plasticity. Here we explore the effects of odor deprivation on the adult mouse olfactory epithelium (OE) using nasal plugs to eliminate nasal airflow unilaterally. Plugs were in place for 2-6 wk after which electroolfactograms (EOGs) were recorded from the occluded and open sides of the nasal cavity. Mean EOG amplitudes were significantly greater on the occluded than on the open side. The duration of plugging did not affect the results, suggesting that maximal compensation occurs within 2 wk or less. The magnitude of the EOG difference between the open and occluded side in plugged mice was comparable to adults that had undergone surgical naris occlusion as neonates. When plugs were removed after 4 wk followed by 2 wk of recovery, mean EOG amplitudes were not significantly different between the always-open and previously plugged sides of the nasal cavity suggesting that this form of plasticity is reversible. Taken together, these results suggest that compensatory plasticity is a constitutive mechanism of olfactory receptor neurons that allows these cells to recalibrate their stimulus-response relationship to fit the statistics of their current odor environment.

Citing Articles

The influence of olfactory experience on the birthrates of olfactory sensory neurons with specific odorant receptor identities.

Rufenacht K, Asson A, Hossain K, Santoro S Genesis. 2024; 62(3):e23611.

PMID: 38888221 PMC: 11189617. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23611.


Craniofacial and olfactory sensory changes after long-term unilateral nasal obstruction-an animal study using MMP-3-LUC transgenic rats.

Hsu L, Ratanasereeprasert N, Wang S, Chen J, Chen Y, Yeh T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2616.

PMID: 38297007 PMC: 10830476. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51544-3.


The Role of the Stimulus in Olfactory Plasticity.

Coppola D, Reisert J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002512 PMC: 10669894. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111553.


Transcriptional adaptation of olfactory sensory neurons to GPCR identity and activity.

Horgue L, Assens A, Fodoulian L, Marconi L, Tuberosa J, Haider A Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):2929.

PMID: 35614043 PMC: 9132991. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30511-4.


A transcriptional rheostat couples past activity to future sensory responses.

Tsukahara T, Brann D, Pashkovski S, Guitchounts G, Bozza T, Datta S Cell. 2021; 184(26):6326-6343.e32.

PMID: 34879231 PMC: 8758202. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.022.


References
1.
Wei J, Zhao A, Chan G, Baker L, Impey S, Beavo J . Phosphorylation and inhibition of olfactory adenylyl cyclase by CaM kinase II in Neurons: a mechanism for attenuation of olfactory signals. Neuron. 1998; 21(3):495-504. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80561-9. View

2.
Vassar R, Ngai J, Axel R . Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Cell. 1993; 74(2):309-18. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90422-m. View

3.
Cummings D, HENNING H, Brunjes P . Olfactory bulb recovery after early sensory deprivation. J Neurosci. 1997; 17(19):7433-40. PMC: 6573448. View

4.
Wark B, Lundstrom B, Fairhall A . Sensory adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007; 17(4):423-9. PMC: 2084204. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.001. View

5.
Hamilton K, Coppola D . Distribution of GluR1 is altered in the olfactory bulb following neonatal naris occlusion. J Neurobiol. 2002; 54(2):326-36. DOI: 10.1002/neu.10182. View