» Articles » PMID: 26268898

Lys39-Lysophosphatidate Carbonyl Oxygen Interaction Locks LPA1 N-terminal Cap to the Orthosteric Site and Partners Arg124 During Receptor Activation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Aug 14
PMID 26268898
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor 1 (LPA1) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptors mediating the biological response to LPA species. Lack of detailed mechanism underlying LPA/LPA1 interaction has hampered the development of specific antagonists. Here, novel N-terminal Lys39 has been identified as a key residue during LPA-type agonist binding and LPA1 activation. Analysis of the molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories showed that LPA-type agonist but not VPC-32183 (antagonist) evolved structures with classical GPCR activation signatures such as reduced cytoplasmic transmembrane (TM) 3/TM6 dynamic network, ruptured ionic lock, and formation of a continuous and highly ordered internal water pathway was also observed. In activated state, LPA-type agonists interact with Arg124 (R3.28), Gln125 (Q3.29), Lys294 (K7.36) and a novel N-terminal Lys39. Site-directed mutagenesis showed complete loss of intracellular calcium mobilization in B103 cells expressing R3.28A and Lys39Ala when treated with LPA-type agonists. Structurally, LPA-type agonist via Carbonyl-oxygen/Lys39 interaction facilitated the formation of a hypothetical N-terminal cap tightly packed over LPA1 heptahelical bundle. This packing may represent a key mechanism to distinguish an apo-receptor from bound LPA1.

Citing Articles

Benzimidazole compound abrogates SARS-COV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)/ACE2 interaction In vitro.

Omotuyi O, Olatunji O, Nash O, Oyinloye B, Soremekun O, Ijagbuji A Microb Pathog. 2023; 176:105994.

PMID: 36682669 PMC: 9851952. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.105994.


Structure of the active G-coupled human lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 complexed with a potent agonist.

Akasaka H, Tanaka T, Sano F, Matsuzaki Y, Shihoya W, Nureki O Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):5417.

PMID: 36109516 PMC: 9477835. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33121-2.


SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike glycoprotein receptor binding domain exhibits super-binder ability with ACE2 but not convalescent monoclonal antibody.

Omotuyi O, Olubiyi O, Nash O, Afolabi E, Oyinloye B, Fatumo S Comput Biol Med. 2022; 142:105226.

PMID: 35066447 PMC: 8739363. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105226.


Lysophosphatidic Acid Signaling in Cancer Cells: What Makes LPA So Special?.

Balijepalli P, Sitton C, Meier K Cells. 2021; 10(8).

PMID: 34440828 PMC: 8394178. DOI: 10.3390/cells10082059.


Atomistic simulation reveals structural mechanisms underlying D614G spike glycoprotein-enhanced fitness in SARS-COV-2.

Omotuyi I, Nash O, Ajiboye O, Iwegbulam C, Oyinloye E, Oyedeji O J Comput Chem. 2020; 41(24):2158-2161.

PMID: 32779780 PMC: 7404873. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26383.


References
1.
Takuwa Y, Takuwa N, Sugimoto N . The Edg family G protein-coupled receptors for lysophospholipids: their signaling properties and biological activities. J Biochem. 2002; 131(6):767-71. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003163. View

2.
Sevier C, Kaiser C . Formation and transfer of disulphide bonds in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3(11):836-47. DOI: 10.1038/nrm954. View

3.
Ohta H, Sato K, Murata N, Damirin A, Malchinkhuu E, Kon J . Ki16425, a subtype-selective antagonist for EDG-family lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2003; 64(4):994-1005. DOI: 10.1124/mol.64.4.994. View

4.
Hilal-Dandan R, Means C, Gustafsson A, Morissette M, Adams J, Brunton L . Lysophosphatidic acid induces hypertrophy of neonatal cardiac myocytes via activation of Gi and Rho. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004; 36(4):481-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2003.12.010. View

5.
McAllister S, Hurst D, Barnett-Norris J, Lynch D, Reggio P, Abood M . Structural mimicry in class A G protein-coupled receptor rotamer toggle switches: the importance of the F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) interaction in cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(46):48024-37. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406648200. View