» Articles » PMID: 26265174

Are Patients With Cancer Less Willing to Share Their Health Information? Privacy, Sensitivity, and Social Purpose

Overview
Journal J Oncol Pract
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Aug 13
PMID 26265174
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Growing use of electronic health information increases opportunities to build population cancer databases for research and care delivery. Understanding patient views on reuse of health information is essential to shape privacy policies and build trust in these initiatives.

Methods: We randomly assigned nationally representative participants (N = 3,336) with and without prior cancer to six of 18 scenarios describing different uses of electronic health information. The scenarios varied the user, use, and sensitivity of the information. Participants rated each scenario on a scale of 1 to 10 assessing their willingness to share their electronic health information. We used conjoint analysis to measure the relative importance of each attribute (ie, use, user, and sensitivity).

Results: Participants with and without a prior diagnosis of cancer had a similar willingness to share health information (0.27; P = .42). Both cancer and noncancer participants rated the purpose of information use as the most important factor (importance weights, 67.1% and 45.6%, respectively). For cancer participants, the sensitivity of the information was more important (importance weights, 29.8% v 1.2%). However, cancer participants were more willing to share their health information when the information included more sensitive genetic information (0.48; P = .015). Cancer and noncancer respondents rated uses and users similarly.

Conclusion: The information sharing preferences of participants with and without a prior diagnosis of cancer were driven mainly by the purpose of information reuse. Although conventional thinking suggests patients with cancer might be less willing to share their health information, we found participants with cancer were more willing to share their inherited genetic information.

Citing Articles

Application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the Study of Prostate Cancer Disparities: A Systematic Review.

El Khoury C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123443 PMC: 11312136. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152715.


Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.

Baines R, Stevens S, Austin D, Anil K, Bradwell H, Cooper L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50421.

PMID: 38441944 PMC: 10951832. DOI: 10.2196/50421.


How patients distinguish between clinical and administrative predictive models in health care.

Nong P, Adler-Milstein J, Platt J Am J Manag Care. 2024; 30(1):31-37.

PMID: 38271580 PMC: 10962331. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89484.


Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.

Benevento M, Mandarelli G, Carravetta F, Ferorelli D, Caterino C, Nicoli S Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1213615.

PMID: 37546309 PMC: 10397406. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615.


Health Research with Data in a Time of Privacy: Which Information do Patients Want?.

Beusink M, Koetsveld F, van Scheijen S, Janssen T, Buiter M, Schmidt M J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023; 18(4):304-316.

PMID: 37309128 PMC: 10496423. DOI: 10.1177/15562646231181439.


References
1.
Wallace P, Shah N, Dennen T, Bleicher P, Bleicher P, Crown W . Optum Labs: building a novel node in the learning health care system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(7):1187-94. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0038. View

2.
Erlich Y, Williams J, Glazer D, Yocum K, Farahany N, Olson M . Redefining genomic privacy: trust and empowerment. PLoS Biol. 2014; 12(11):e1001983. PMC: 4219652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983. View

3.
Trinidad S, Fullerton S, Bares J, Jarvik G, Larson E, Burke W . Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Genet Med. 2010; 12(8):486-95. PMC: 3045967. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e. View

4.
Peabody J, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus T, Lee M . Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2001; 283(13):1715-22. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715. View

5.
Peterson E, Milliron K, Lewis K, Goold S, Merajver S . Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11(1):79-87. View