» Articles » PMID: 26264211

STAT3 Polymorphisms May Predict an Unfavorable Response to First-line Platinum-based Therapy for Women with Advanced Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Aug 13
PMID 26264211
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSC) contribute to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) progression and therapeutic response. We hypothesized that germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CSC-related genes may predict an initial therapeutic response for women newly diagnosed with EOC. A nested case-control design was used to study 361 women with advanced-stage serous EOC treated with surgery followed by first-line platinum-based combination therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center or as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas Study. "Cases" included 102 incomplete responders (IRs) and "controls" included 259 complete clinical responders (CRs) to therapy. Using Illumina genotyping arrays and imputation, DNA samples were evaluated for 5,509 SNPs in 24 ovarian CSC-related genes. We also evaluated the overall significance of each CSC gene using the admixture maximum likelihood (AML) test, and correlated genotype with EOC tumor tissue expression. The strongest SNP-level associations with an IR to therapy were identified for correlated (r(2) > 0.80) SNPs within signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [odds ratio (OR), 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.78; p = 0.0027], after adjustment for age, population stratification, grade and residual disease. At the gene level, STAT3 was significantly associated with an IR to therapy (pAML = 0.006). rs1053004, a STAT3 SNP in a putative miRNA-binding site, was associated with STAT3 expression (p = 0.057). This is the first study to identify germline STAT3 variants as independent predictors of an unfavorable therapeutic response for EOC patients. Findings suggest that STAT3 genotype may identify high-risk women likely to respond more favorably to novel therapeutic combinations that include STAT3 inhibitors.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of apoptosis-related non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer: a narrative review.

Wang Y, Wang S, He H, Bai Y, Liu Z, Sabihi S Apoptosis. 2025; .

PMID: 39833637 DOI: 10.1007/s10495-024-02074-w.


Pharmacogenetics Role of Genetic Variants in Immune-Related Factors: A Systematic Review Focusing on mCRC.

Scarabel L, Bignucolo A, Toffoli G, Cecchin E, De Mattia E Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 36432658 PMC: 9693433. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112468.


The "Sweet Spot" of Targeting Tumor Metabolism in Ovarian Cancers.

Tondo-Steele K, McLean K Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(19).

PMID: 36230617 PMC: 9562887. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194696.


STAT3 polymorphisms in North Africa and its implication in breast cancer.

Ziadi W, Boussetta S, Elkamel S, Pakstis A, Kidd K, Medimegh I Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021; 9(8):e1744.

PMID: 34251094 PMC: 8404238. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1744.


Nitidine chloride suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell-like properties in glioblastoma by regulating JAK2/STAT3 signaling.

Jia M, Wang Y, Guo Y, Yu P, Sun Y, Song Y Cancer Med. 2021; 10(9):3113-3128.

PMID: 33788424 PMC: 8085923. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3869.


References
1.
Fasching P, Gayther S, Pearce L, Schildkraut J, Goode E, Thiel F . Role of genetic polymorphisms and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Mol Oncol. 2009; 3(2):171-81. PMC: 5527888. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.008. View

2.
Gerger A, Zhang W, Yang D, Bohanes P, Ning Y, Winder T . Common cancer stem cell gene variants predict colon cancer recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(21):6934-43. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1180. View

3.
Deng S, Yang X, Lassus H, Liang S, Kaur S, Ye Q . Distinct expression levels and patterns of stem cell marker, aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform 1 (ALDH1), in human epithelial cancers. PLoS One. 2010; 5(4):e10277. PMC: 2858084. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010277. View

4.
Foster R, Buckanovich R, Rueda B . Ovarian cancer stem cells: working towards the root of stemness. Cancer Lett. 2012; 338(1):147-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.10.023. View

5.
Price A, Patterson N, Plenge R, Weinblatt M, Shadick N, Reich D . Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(8):904-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng1847. View