» Articles » PMID: 26261726

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Role in 2014 and Beyond

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 12
PMID 26261726
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has found new avenues for performing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) procedures, a historically technically challenging operation. Multiple studies have found laparoscopic PD to be safe, with equivalent oncologic outcomes as compared to open PD. In addition, several series have described potential benefits to minimally invasive PD including fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospital length of stay, and decreased postoperative pain. Yet, despite these promising initial results, laparoscopic PDs have not become widely adopted by the surgical community. In fact, the vast majority of pancreatic resections performed in the United States are still performed in an open fashion, and there are only a handful of surgeons who actually perform purely laparoscopic PDs. On the other hand, robotic assisted surgery offers many technical advantages over laparoscopic surgery including high-definition, 3-D optics, enhanced suturing ability, and more degrees of freedom of movement by means of fully-wristed instruments. Similar to laparoscopic PD, there are now several case series that have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic PD with seemingly equivalent short-term oncologic outcomes as compared to open technique. In addition, having the surgeon seated for the procedure with padded arm-rests, there is an ergonomic advantage of robotics over both open and laparoscopic approaches, where one has to stand up for prolonged periods of time. Future technologic innovations will likely focus on enhanced robotic capabilities to improve ease of use in the operating room. Last but not least, robotic assisted surgery training will continue to be a part of surgical education curriculum ensuring the increased use of this technology by future generations of surgeons.

Citing Articles

Perioperative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Armengol-Garcia C, Blandin-Alvarez V, Sharma E, Salinas-Ruiz L, Gonzalez-Mendez M, Monteiro Dos Santos M Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(3):1462-1472.

PMID: 39880981 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11515-1.


Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasm: a propensity matched analysis of peri-operative and oncologic outcomes.

Varshney V, Rathore K, Selvakumar B, Soni S, Varshney P, Agarwal L Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(2):922-931.

PMID: 39630267 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11423-4.


The Revo-i Robotic Surgical System in Advanced Pancreatic Surgery: A Second Non-Randomized Clinical Trial and Comparative Analysis to the da Vinci™ System.

Kim J, Choi M, Hwang H, Lee W, Kang C Yonsei Med J. 2024; 65(3):148-155.

PMID: 38373834 PMC: 10896669. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0140.


New perspectives on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Kalabin A, Mani V, Kruse R, Schlesselman C, Li K, Staveley-OCarroll K World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(1):60-71.

PMID: 36741067 PMC: 9896499. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.60.


A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-center experience.

Zong K, Luo K, Chen K, Ye J, Liu W, Zhai W Front Oncol. 2022; 12:960241.

PMID: 36276160 PMC: 9581246. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960241.


References
1.
Giulianotti P, Sbrana F, Bianco F, Elli E, Shah G, Addeo P . Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(7):1646-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0825-4. View

2.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

3.
Winer J, Can M, Bartlett D, Zeh H, Zureikat A . The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 9(8):468-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.120. View

4.
Zhang J, Wu W, You L, Zhao Y . Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(6):1774-80. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2823-3. View

5.
Cho A, Yamamoto H, Nagata M, Takiguchi N, Shimada H, Kainuma O . A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction. Surg Today. 2009; 39(4):359-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-008-3853-0. View