» Articles » PMID: 26258587

Procedures for the Quantification of Whole-tissue Immunofluorescence Images Obtained at Single-cell Resolution During Murine Tubular Organ Development

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Aug 11
PMID 26258587
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whole-tissue quantification at single-cell resolution has become an inevitable approach for further quantitative understanding of morphogenesis in organ development. The feasibility of the approach has been dramatically increased by recent technological improvements in optical tissue clearing and microscopy. However, the series of procedures required for this approach to lead to successful whole-tissue quantification is far from developed. To provide the appropriate procedure, we here show tips for each critical step of the entire process, including fixation for immunofluorescence, optical clearing, and digital image processing, using developing murine internal organs such as epididymis, kidney, and lung as an example. Through comparison of fixative solutions and of clearing methods, we found optimal conditions to achieve clearer deep-tissue imaging of specific immunolabeled targets and explain what methods result in vivid volume imaging. In addition, we demonstrated that three-dimensional digital image processing after optical clearing produces objective quantitative data for the whole-tissue analysis, focusing on the spatial distribution of mitotic cells in the epididymal tubule. The procedure for the whole-tissue quantification shown in this article should contribute to systematic measurements of cellular processes in developing organs, accelerating the further understanding of morphogenesis at the single cell level.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of fixation techniques for signal detection in avian embryos.

Echeverria Jr C, Leathers T, Rogers C Dev Biol. 2024; 517:13-23.

PMID: 39245159 PMC: 11631674. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.09.002.


Validation of a semi-quantitative scoring system and workflow for analysis of fluorescence quantification in companion animals.

Ram A, Matuszewska K, McKenna C, Petrik J, Oblak M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1392504.

PMID: 39144083 PMC: 11322124. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1392504.


Effectiveness of fixation methods for wholemount immunohistochemistry across cellular compartments in chick embryos.

Echeverria Jr C, Leathers T, Rogers C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38585750 PMC: 10996528. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.23.586361.


Collective cell dynamics and luminal fluid flow in the epididymis: A mechanobiological perspective.

Lee V, Hinton B, Hirashima T Andrology. 2023; 12(5):939-948.

PMID: 37415418 PMC: 11278975. DOI: 10.1111/andr.13490.


Stalling interkinetic nuclear migration in curved pseudostratified epithelium of developing cochlea.

Ishii M, Tateya T, Matsuda M, Hirashima T R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(12):211024.

PMID: 34909216 PMC: 8652271. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211024.


References
1.
Hirashima T . Pattern formation of an epithelial tubule by mechanical instability during epididymal development. Cell Rep. 2014; 9(3):866-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.041. View

2.
Tang N, Marshall W, McMahon M, Metzger R, Martin G . Control of mitotic spindle angle by the RAS-regulated ERK1/2 pathway determines lung tube shape. Science. 2011; 333(6040):342-345. PMC: 4260627. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204831. View

3.
Walter T, Shattuck D, Baldock R, Bastin M, Carpenter A, Duce S . Visualization of image data from cells to organisms. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(3 Suppl):S26-41. PMC: 3650473. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1431. View

4.
Packard A, Georgas K, Michos O, Riccio P, Cebrian C, Combes A . Luminal mitosis drives epithelial cell dispersal within the branching ureteric bud. Dev Cell. 2013; 27(3):319-30. PMC: 3926506. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.001. View

5.
Short K, Hodson M, Smyth I . Spatial mapping and quantification of developmental branching morphogenesis. Development. 2012; 140(2):471-8. DOI: 10.1242/dev.088500. View