New Approach of Maxillary Protraction Using Modified C-palatal Plates in Class III Patients

Overview

Journal Korean J Orthod

Date 2015 Aug 11

PMID 26258067

Citations 5

Authors

Yoon-Ah Kook

Mohamed Bayome

Jae Hyun Park

Ki Beom Kim

Seong-Hun Kim

Kyu-Rhim Chung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Maxillary protraction is the conventional treatment for growing Class III patients with maxillary deficiency, but it has undesirable dental effects. The purpose of this report is to introduce an alternative modality of maxillary protraction in patients with dentoskeletal Class III malocclusion using a modified C-palatal plate connected with elastics to a face mask. This method improved skeletal measurements, corrected overjet, and slightly improved the profile. The patients may require definitive treatment in adolescence or adulthood. The modified C-palatal plate enables nonsurgical maxillary advancement with maximal skeletal effects and minimal dental side effects.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Maxillary Protraction Using a Mini Screw-Retained Palatal C-Shaped Plate and Face Mask.

Elsaharty M, Ghobashi S, El-Shorbagy E Turk J Orthod. 2024; 37(3):146-152.

PMID: 39344854 PMC: 11589173. DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.63.

Effect of Different Mini Implant Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) Designs on Maxillary Protraction in Skeletal Class III malocclusion: An FEM Study.

Suresh A, Vallikat Velath A, Sarika K, Prabha R, Varma N Contemp Clin Dent. 2024; 15(1):27-34.

PMID: 38707668 PMC: 11068238. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_428_23.

Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Kamath A, Sudhakar S, Kannan G, Rai K, Sb A J Orthod Sci. 2022; 11:8.

PMID: 35754417 PMC: 9214452. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_153_21.

Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Liang S, Xie X, Wang F, Chang Q, Wang H, Bai Y Korean J Orthod. 2020; 50(5):346-355.

PMID: 32938827 PMC: 7500574. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.346.

Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction using palatal plates: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Eom J, Bayome M, Park J, Lim H, Kook Y, Han S Korean J Orthod. 2018; 48(5):304-315.

PMID: 30206529 PMC: 6123076. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.5.304.

References

Kim J, Viana M, GRABER T, Omerza F, BeGole E . The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(6):675-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70294-5. View

Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H . Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123(5):571-7. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540603000520. View

Favero L, Winkler A, Favero V . Non-compliant maxillary protraction by orthodontic micro-implants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012; 13(3):244-8. View

Lee S, Park J, Bayome M, Kim H, Mo S, Kook Y . Palatal soft tissue thickness at different ages using an ultrasonic device. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 36(4):405-9. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.36.4.58tm38928v522283. View

Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Franchi L, Drescher D . Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2014; 85(5):764-70. PMC: 8610391. DOI: 10.2319/071614-497.1. View

Smalley W, Shapiro P, Hohl T, Kokich V, Branemark P . Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94(4):285-95. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90053-4. View

Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, Heymann G, Paula L, De Clerck H . Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140(6):790-8. PMC: 3734342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.025. View

Han S, Bayome M, Lee J, Lee Y, Song H, Kook Y . Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices. Angle Orthod. 2011; 82(4):625-31. PMC: 8845559. DOI: 10.2319/071311-445.1. View

Singer S, Henry P, Rosenberg I . Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(3):253-62. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0253:OIAAAT>2.0.CO;2. View

10.

Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F . Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(4):639-46. PMC: 8919738. DOI: 10.2319/081010-473.1. View

11.

Cha B, Choi D, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann P, Kim S, Jang I . Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(1):99-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.025. View

12.

Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Sato T, Kawaguchi M, Goto S . Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes. Korean J Orthod. 2014; 44(2):88-95. PMC: 3971130. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.88. View

13.

Kook Y, Lee D, Kim S, Chung K . Design improvements in the modified C-palatal plate for molar distalization. J Clin Orthod. 2013; 47(4):241-8. View

14.

Ryu J, Park J, Vu Thi Thu T, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook Y . Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142(2):207-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.027. View

15.

Gallagher R, Miranda F, Buschang P . Maxillary protraction: treatment and posttreatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113(6):612-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70220-3. View

16.

Kama J, Ozer T, Baran S . Orthodontic and orthopaedic changes associated with treatment in subjects with Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28(5):496-502. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl011. View

17.

Kook Y, Kim S, Chung K . A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization. J Clin Orthod. 2011; 44(12):719-30. View

18.

Baik H . Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108(6):583-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70003-x. View

19.

Feng X, Li J, Li Y, Zhao Z, Zhao S, Wang J . Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(6):1107-14. PMC: 8813151. DOI: 10.2319/111411-705.1. View

20.

Kim K, Bayome M, Park J, Kim K, Mo S, Kook Y . Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 37(3):275-83. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju039. View