» Articles » PMID: 26256860

Novel Methods for Mapping the Cavernous Nerves During Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2015 Aug 11
PMID 26256860
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cavernous nerves, which course along the surface of the prostate gland, are responsible for erectile function. During radical prostatectomy, urologists are challenged in preserving these nerves and their function. Cavernous nerves are microscopic and show variable location in different patients; therefore, postoperative sexual potency rates are widely variable following radical prostatectomy. A variety of technologies, including electrical and optical nerve stimulation, dye-based optical fluorescence and microscopy, spectroscopy, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have all been used to study cavernous nerve anatomy and physiology, and some of these methods are also potential intraoperative methods for identifying and preserving cavernous nerves. However, all of these technologies have inherent limitations, including slow or inconsistent nerve responses, poor image resolution, shallow image depth, slow image acquisition times and/or safety concerns. New and emerging technologies, as well as multimodal approaches combining existing methods, hold promise for improved postoperative sexual outcomes and patient quality of life following radical prostatectomy.

Citing Articles

Imaging of prostate micro-architecture using three-dimensional wide-field optical coherence tomography.

Skrok M, Tamborski S, Hepburn M, Fang Q, Maniewski M, Zdrenka M Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(12):6816-6833.

PMID: 39679405 PMC: 11640564. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.537783.


Nerve graft for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: animal study and clinical data-a narrative review.

Shu T, Ren D, Cao Y, Wang R Int J Impot Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39567674 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-01000-7.


Infrared neural stimulation markedly enhances nerve functionality assessment during nerve monitoring.

Throckmorton G, Thayer W, Jansen E, Mahadevan-Jansen A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4362.

PMID: 36928795 PMC: 10020565. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31384-3.


Stimulators and activators of soluble guanylate cyclase for urogenital disorders.

Monica F, Antunes E Nat Rev Urol. 2017; 15(1):42-54.

PMID: 29133940 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.181.


Neuroprotective and Nerve Regenerative Approaches for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction after Cavernous Nerve Injury.

Campbell J, Burnett A Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(8).

PMID: 28820434 PMC: 5578182. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18081794.


References
1.
Inoue K, Ashida S, Fukuhara H, Iiyama T, Miyamura M, Kurabayashi A . Application of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic diagnosis to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013; 82(5):1175-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.051. View

2.
Tsai Y, Jou Y, Chen C, Chang C, Yang W, Lai J . Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy. J Endourol. 2013; 28(3):364-70. PMC: 3929133. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0383. View

3.
Cesare P, Moriondo A, Vellani V, McNaughton P . Ion channels gated by heat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(14):7658-63. PMC: 33597. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7658. View

4.
Wells J, Kao C, Jansen E, Konrad P, Mahadevan-Jansen A . Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation. J Biomed Opt. 2006; 10(6):064003. DOI: 10.1117/1.2121772. View

5.
Baykara M, Denkceken T, Bassorgun I, Akin Y, Yucel S, Canpolat M . Detecting positive surgical margins using single optical fiber probe during radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Urology. 2014; 83(6):1438-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.020. View