» Articles » PMID: 26255654

How Oocytes Try to Get It Right: Spindle Checkpoint Control in Meiosis

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2015 Aug 11
PMID 26255654
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The generation of a viable, diploid organism depends on the formation of haploid gametes, oocytes, and spermatocytes, with the correct number of chromosomes. Halving the genome requires the execution of two consecutive specialized cell divisions named meiosis I and II. Unfortunately, and in contrast to male meiosis, chromosome segregation in oocytes is error prone, with human oocytes being extraordinarily "meiotically challenged". Aneuploid oocytes, that are with the wrong number of chromosomes, give rise to aneuploid embryos when fertilized. In humans, most aneuploidies are lethal and result in spontaneous abortions. However, some trisomies survive to birth or even adulthood, such as the well-known trisomy 21, which gives rise to Down syndrome (Nagaoka et al. in Nat Rev Genet 13:493-504, 2012). A staggering 20-25 % of oocytes ready to be fertilized are aneuploid in humans. If this were not bad enough, there is an additional increase in meiotic missegregations as women get closer to menopause. A woman above 40 has a risk of more than 30 % of getting pregnant with a trisomic child. Worse still, in industrialized western societies, child birth is delayed, with women getting their first child later in life than ever. This trend has led to an increase of trisomic pregnancies by 70 % in the last 30 years (Nagaoka et al. in Nat Rev Genet 13:493-504, 2012; Schmidt et al. in Hum Reprod Update 18:29-43, 2012). To understand why errors occur so frequently during the meiotic divisions in oocytes, we review here the molecular mechanisms at works to control chromosome segregation during meiosis. An important mitotic control mechanism, namely the spindle assembly checkpoint or SAC, has been adapted to the special requirements of the meiotic divisions, and this review will focus on our current knowledge of SAC control in mammalian oocytes. Knowledge on how chromosome segregation is controlled in mammalian oocytes may help to identify risk factors important for questions related to human reproductive health.

Citing Articles

Distinct checkpoint and homolog biorientation pathways regulate meiosis I in Drosophila oocytes.

Shapiro J, Changela N, Jang J, Joshi J, McKim K PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(1):e1011400.

PMID: 39879252 PMC: 11809923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011400.


Distinct checkpoint and homolog biorientation pathways regulate meiosis I in oocytes.

Shapiro J, Changela N, Jang J, Joshi J, McKim K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39229242 PMC: 11370425. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.21.608908.


Kinesin KIFC3 is essential for microtubule stability and cytokinesis in oocyte meiosis.

Ju J, Zhang H, Wang Y, Hu L, Sun S Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):199.

PMID: 38553728 PMC: 10979585. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01589-8.


Double-checking chromosome segregation.

Maiato H, Silva S J Cell Biol. 2023; 222(5).

PMID: 37017932 PMC: 10082326. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202301106.


Genetic control of meiosis surveillance mechanisms in mammals.

Huang Y, Roig I Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1127440.

PMID: 36910159 PMC: 9996228. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1127440.


References
1.
Nagaoka S, Hodges C, Albertini D, Hunt P . Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors. Curr Biol. 2011; 21(8):651-7. PMC: 3225230. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.003. View

2.
Gui L, Homer H . Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes. Development. 2012; 139(11):1941-6. PMC: 3347686. DOI: 10.1242/dev.078352. View

3.
Liu L, Keefe D . Ageing-associated aberration in meiosis of oocytes from senescence-accelerated mice. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(10):2678-85. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2678. View

4.
Hauf S . The spindle assembly checkpoint: progress and persistent puzzles. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013; 41(6):1755-60. DOI: 10.1042/BST20130240. View

5.
Terret M, Wassmann K . [Meiotic weakness: the first division]. Med Sci (Paris). 2008; 24(2):197-203. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2008242197. View