» Articles » PMID: 26253698

From Global Agenda-setting to Domestic Implementation: Successes and Challenges of the Global Health Network on Tobacco Control

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 9
PMID 26253698
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Global policy attention to tobacco control has increased significantly since the 1990 s and culminated in the first international treaty negotiated under the auspices of the World Health Organization--the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Although the political process that led to the creation of the FCTC has been extensively researched, the FCTC's progression from an aspirational treaty towards a global health governance framework with tangible policy effects within FCTC member countries has not been well-understood to date. This article analyses the role of the global health network of tobacco control advocates and scientists, which formed during the FCTC negotiations during the late 1990 s, in translating countries' commitment to the FCTC into domestic policy change. By comparing the network's influence around two central tobacco control interventions (smoke-free environments and taxation), the study identifies several scope conditions, which have shaped the network's effectiveness around the FCTC's implementation: the complexity of the policy issue and the relative importance of non-health expertise, the required scope of domestic political buy-in, the role of the general public as network allies, and the strength of policy opposition. These political factors had a greater influence on the network's success than the evidence base for the effectiveness of tobacco control interventions. The network's variable success points to a trade-off faced by global health networks between their need to maintain internal cohesion and their ability to form alliances with actors in their social environment.

Citing Articles

Tobacco industry narratives of e-cigarette use in the UK: a qualitative framing analysis.

Harrison E, Petticrew M, Burns R, van Schalkwyk M, Hawkins B Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39569481 PMC: 11579614. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae161.


Factors shaping network emergence: A cross-country comparison of quality of care networks in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

Shawar Y, Djellouli N, Akter K, Payne W, Kinney M, Mwaba K PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0001839.

PMID: 39042649 PMC: 11265678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001839.


Framing health taxes: learning from low- and middle-income countries.

Suu Lwin K, Koon A, Rasanathan K, Ahsan A, Erku D, Mialon M BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(Suppl 8).

PMID: 37832966 PMC: 10583086. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012955.


A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review.

Townsend B, Johnson T, Ralston R, Cullerton K, Martin J, Collin J Global Health. 2023; 19(1):74.

PMID: 37817196 PMC: 10565967. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00978-x.


Defending Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy Implementation in Nepal From Tobacco Industry Interference (2011-2018).

Bhatta D, Crosbie E, Bialous S, Glantz S Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22(12):2203-2212.

PMID: 32309853 PMC: 7733063. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa067.


References
1.
Leischow S, Ayo-Yusuf O, Backinger C . Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 15(4):761-6. PMC: 3693497. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts199. View

2.
Mamudu H, Gonzalez M, Glantz S . The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(11):2044-54. PMC: 3207640. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300303. View

3.
Mackay J . The making of a convention on tobacco control. Bull World Health Organ. 2003; 81(8):551. PMC: 2572518. View

4.
Munzer A . The WHO FCTC: the challenge of implementation. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 1(3):182-4. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70048-1. View

5.
Warner K . The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: opportunities and issues. Salud Publica Mex. 2008; 50 Suppl 3:S283-91. DOI: 10.1590/s0036-36342008000900004. View