» Articles » PMID: 26251721

A Review of Feed Efficiency in Swine: Biology and Application

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Aug 8
PMID 26251721
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Feed efficiency represents the cumulative efficiency with which the pig utilizes dietary nutrients for maintenance, lean gain and lipid accretion. It is closely linked with energy metabolism, as the oxidation of carbon-containing components in the feed drive all metabolic processes. While much is known about nutrient utilization and tissue metabolism, blending these subjects into a discussion on feed efficiency has proven to be difficult. For example, while increasing dietary energy concentration will almost certainly increase feed efficiency, the correlation between dietary energy concentration and feed efficiency is surprisingly low. This is likely due to the plethora of non-dietary factors that impact feed efficiency, such as the environment and health as well as individual variation in maintenance requirements, body composition and body weight. Nonetheless, a deeper understanding of feed efficiency is critical at many levels. To individual farms, it impacts profitability. To the pork industry, it represents its competitive position against other protein sources. To food economists, it means less demand on global feed resources. There are environmental and other societal implications as well. Interestingly, feed efficiency is not always reported simply as a ratio of body weight gain to feed consumed. This review will explain why this arithmetic calculation, as simple as it initially seems, and as universally applied as it is in science and commerce, can often be misleading due to errors inherent in recording of both weight gain and feed intake. This review discusses the importance of feed efficiency, the manner in which it can be measured and reported, its basis in biology and approaches to its improvement. It concludes with a summary of findings and recommendations for future efforts.

Citing Articles

The effect of swine insurance participation on swine production efficiency: Evidence from China.

Feng J, He S, Wan C, Liu J, Xie F PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0317759.

PMID: 40073009 PMC: 11902217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317759.


Performance, carcass, and pork traits in barrows and gilts slaughtered over 130 kg: insights from a Brazilian perspective.

Alves L, Carnino B, Muro B, Pairis-Garcia M, Dipold C, Dos Santos F Transl Anim Sci. 2025; 9:txaf023.

PMID: 40041721 PMC: 11879026. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaf023.


Integrating gut and IgA-coated microbiota to identify as a probiotic for enhancing feed efficiency in chickens.

Xie C, Cheng J, Chen P, Yan X, Luo C, Qu H Imeta. 2025; 4(1):e264.

PMID: 40027490 PMC: 11865324. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.264.


Different starch sources and amino acid levels on growth performance, starch and amino acids digestion, absorption and metabolism of 0- to 3-week-old broilers fed low protein diet.

Luo C, Wang J, Jiang W, Yin D, Meng G, Wang J Anim Nutr. 2025; 20:277-290.

PMID: 39995521 PMC: 11847748. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.11.004.


Abnormal adipose tissue-derived microbes drive metabolic disorder and exacerbate postnatal growth retardation in piglet.

Song T, Qi M, Zhu Y, Wang N, Liu Z, Li N Life Metab. 2025; 3(2):load052.

PMID: 39872217 PMC: 11749387. DOI: 10.1093/lifemeta/load052.


References
1.
Vazquez J, Parrilla I, Roca J, Gil M, Cuello C, Vazquez J . Sex-sorting sperm by flow cytometry in pigs: issues and perspectives. Theriogenology. 2008; 71(1):80-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.044. View

2.
Zamaratskaia G, Squires E . Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal. 2012; 3(11):1508-21. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108003674. View

3.
Noblet J, Karege C, Dubois S, van Milgen J . Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77(5):1208-16. DOI: 10.2527/1999.7751208x. View

4.
Dunshea F, DSouza D, Pethick D, Harper G, Warner R . Effects of dietary factors and other metabolic modifiers on quality and nutritional value of meat. Meat Sci. 2011; 71(1):8-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.05.001. View

5.
Bauman D, McCutcheon S, Steinhour W, Eppard P, Sechen S . Sources of variation and prospects for improvement of productive efficiency in the dairy cow: a review. J Anim Sci. 1985; 60(2):583-92. DOI: 10.2527/jas1985.602583x. View