» Articles » PMID: 26247104

Social Smile Reproducibility Using 3-D Stereophotogrammetry and Reverse Engineering Technology

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Aug 7
PMID 26247104
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the range of social smile reproducibility using 3-D stereophotogrammetry and reverse engineering technology.

Materials And Methods: Social smile images of white adolescents (N  =  15, mean age  =  15.4 ±1.5 years; range  =  14-17 years) were obtained using 3dMDFlex (3dMD, Atlanta, Ga). Each participant was asked to produce 16 social smiles at 3-minute intervals. All images were obtained in natural head position. Alignment of images, segmentation of smile area, and 3-D deviation analysis were carried out using Geomagic Control software (3D Systems Inc, Cary, NC). A single image was taken as a reference, and the remaining 15 images were compared with the reference image to evaluate positive and negative deviations. The differences between the mean deviation limits of participants with the highest and the lowest deviations and the total mean deviations were evaluated using Bland-Altman Plots.

Results: Minimum and maximum deviations of a single image from the reference image were 0.34 and 2.69 mm, respectively. Lowest deviation between two images was within 0.5 mm and 1.54 mm among all participants (mean, 0.96 ± 0.21 mm), and the highest deviation was between 0.41 mm and 2.69 mm (mean, 1.53 ± 0.46 mm). For a single patient, when all alignments were considered together, the mean deviation was between 0.32 ± 0.10 mm and 0.59 ± 0.24 mm. Mean deviation for one image was between 0.14 and 1.21 mm.

Conclusions: The range of reproducibility of the social smile presented individual variability, but this variation was not clinically significant or detectable under routine clinical observation.

Citing Articles

Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile asymmetry in patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study.

Dindaroglu F, Firinciogullari E, Duran G Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(11):6915-6924.

PMID: 37843635 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05308-4.


Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of facial units in virtual smiling facial images with different smile expressions.

Mai H, Win T, Tong M, Lee C, Lee K, Kim S J Adv Prosthodont. 2023; 15(1):1-10.

PMID: 36908751 PMC: 9992697. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.1.


Perceptual difference of smile aesthetics between 2-dimensional photographs and 3-dimensional dentofacial images: a cross-sectional study.

Xiao Z, Chen G, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Gu Y BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):104.

PMID: 36797718 PMC: 9933254. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02798-2.


Wearable Orofacial Technology and Orthodontics.

Prasad S, Arunachalam S, Boillat T, Ghoneima A, Gandedkar N, Diar-Bakirly S Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36661561 PMC: 9858298. DOI: 10.3390/dj11010024.


Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissues in hyperdivergent skeletal class II females in Guangdong.

Zhang X, Zheng J, Deng J, Wen Z, Chen Z, Gan L BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):56.

PMID: 35351027 PMC: 8966193. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00782-w.


References
1.
Rangel F, Maal T, Berge S, van Vlijmen O, Plooij J, Schutyser F . Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(6):820-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.026. View

2.
Fudalej P . Long-term changes of the upper lip position relative to the incisal edge. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(2):204-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.040. View

3.
Weinberg S, Kolar J . Three-dimensional surface imaging: limitations and considerations from the anthropometric perspective. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16(5):847-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000164330.96675.0c. View

4.
Gunnery S, Ruben M . Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis. Cogn Emot. 2015; 30(3):501-15. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018817. View

5.
Spear F, Kokich V, Mathews D . Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(2):160-9. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0140. View