» Articles » PMID: 26243172

Identifying a Set That Contains the Best Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Overview
Journal Biostatistics
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Aug 6
PMID 26243172
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime (DTR) is a treatment design that seeks to accommodate patient heterogeneity in response to treatment. DTRs can be operationalized by a sequence of decision rules that map patient information to treatment options at specific decision points. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is a trial design that was developed specifically for the purpose of obtaining data that informs the construction of good (i.e. efficacious) decision rules. One of the scientific questions motivating a SMART concerns the comparison of multiple DTRs that are embedded in the design. Typical approaches for identifying the best DTRs involve all possible comparisons between DTRs that are embedded in a SMART, at the cost of greatly reduced power to the extent that the number of embedded DTRs (EDTRs) increase. Here, we propose a method that will enable investigators to use SMART study data more efficiently to identify the set that contains the most efficacious EDTRs. Our method ensures that the true best EDTRs are included in this set with at least a given probability. Simulation results are presented to evaluate the proposed method, and the Extending Treatment Effectiveness of Naltrexone SMART study data are analyzed to illustrate its application.

Citing Articles

Optimal Personalized Treatment Selection with Multivariate Outcome Measures in a Multiple Treatment Case.

Siriwardhana C, Kulasekera K Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2024; 52(12):5773-5787.

PMID: 38371330 PMC: 10871612. DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2021.1999473.


Learning Optimal Group-structured Individualized Treatment Rules with Many Treatments.

Ma H, Zeng D, Liu Y J Mach Learn Res. 2023; 24.

PMID: 37588020 PMC: 10426767.


SMART Binary: New Sample Size Planning Resources for SMART Studies with Binary Outcome Measurements.

Dziak J, Almirall D, Dempsey W, Stanger C, Nahum-Shani I Multivariate Behav Res. 2023; 59(1):1-16.

PMID: 37459401 PMC: 10792389. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2229079.


Nonparametric Bayesian Q-learning for optimization of dynamic treatment regimes in the presence of partial compliance.

Bhattacharya I, Ertefaie A, Lynch K, McKay J, Johnson B Stat Methods Med Res. 2023; 32(9):1649-1663.

PMID: 37322885 PMC: 11625440. DOI: 10.1177/09622802231181223.


Testing adaptive interventions to improve PTSD treatment outcomes in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Sripada R, Smith K, Walters H, Ganoczy D, Kim H, Grau P Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 129:107182.

PMID: 37044157 PMC: 10349653. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107182.


References
1.
Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy S . A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012; 8:21-48. PMC: 3887122. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143152. View

2.
Robins J, Orellana L, Rotnitzky A . Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies. Stat Med. 2008; 27(23):4678-721. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3301. View

3.
Murphy S . An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2004; 24(10):1455-81. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2022. View

4.
Bang H, Robins J . Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics. 2006; 61(4):962-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x. View

5.
Murphy S, van der Laan M, Robins J . Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009; 96(456):1410-1423. PMC: 2794446. DOI: 10.1198/016214501753382327. View