Formaldehyde Exposure in Gross Anatomy Laboratory of Suranaree University of Technology: a Comparison of Area and Personal Sampling

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

Publisher Springer

Specialties Environmental Health
Toxicology

Date 2015 Aug 3

PMID 26233735

Citations 5

Authors

Naruwan Saowakon

Piyada Ngernsoungnern

Pornpun Watcharavitoon

Apichart Ngernsoungnern

Rachain Kosanlavit

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cadavers are usually preserved by embalming solution which is composed of formaldehyde (FA), phenol, and glycerol. Therefore, medical students and instructors have a higher risk of exposure to FA inhalation from cadavers during dissection. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the FA exposure in indoor air and breathing zone of medical students and instructors during dissection classes in order to investigate the relationship between them. The indoor air and personal air samples in breathing zone were collected three times during anatomy dissection classes (in January, August, and October of 2014) with sorbent tubes, which were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The air cleaner machines were determined by weight measurement. Pulmonary function tests and irritation effects were also investigated. The mean of FA concentrations ranged from 0.117 to 0.415 ppm in the indoor air and from 0.126 to 1.176 ppm in the breathing zone of students and instructors. All the personal exposure data obtained exceeded the threshold limit of NIOSH and WHO agencies. The air cleaner machines were not significant difference. The pulmonary function of instructors showed a decrease during attention of classes and statistically significant decreasing in the instructors more than those of the students. Clinical symptoms that were observed in nose and eyes were irritations with general fatigue. We suggested that the modified exhaust ventilation and a locally ventilated dissection work table were considered for reducing FA levels in the gross anatomy dissection room.

Citing Articles

Formaldehyde Levels and the Indoor Air Quality of an Anatomy Dissection Hall with Different Ventilation Setups.

Handady G, Dsouza A, Nayak V, Abraham J Environ Health Insights. 2024; 18:11786302241301590.

PMID: 39610457 PMC: 11603455. DOI: 10.1177/11786302241301590.

Occupational scenarios and exposure assessment to formaldehyde: A systematic review.

Cammalleri V, Pocino R, Marotta D, Protano C, Sinibaldi F, Simonazzi S Indoor Air. 2021; 32(1):e12949.

PMID: 34708443 PMC: 9298394. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12949.

Estimation of occupational formaldehyde exposure in cadaver dissection laboratory and its implications.

Bhat D, Chittoor H, Murugesh P, Basavanna P, Doddaiah S Anat Cell Biol. 2020; 52(4):419-425.

PMID: 31949981 PMC: 6952696. DOI: 10.5115/acb.19.105.

Improvement in histology, enzymatic activity, and redox state of the liver following administration of bark oil in rats with established hepatotoxicity.

Niknezhad F, Sayad-Fathi S, Karimzadeh A, Ghorbani-Anarkooli M, Yousefbeyk F, Nasiri E Anat Cell Biol. 2019; 52(3):302-311.

PMID: 31598360 PMC: 6773892. DOI: 10.5115/acb.18.180.

Changes in Work Practices for Safe Use of Formaldehyde in a University-Based Anatomy Teaching and Research Facility.

Scheepers P, Graumans M, Beckmann G, van Dael M, Anzion R, Melissen M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(9).

PMID: 30235815 PMC: 6164304. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15092049.

References

Ohmichi K, Komiyama M, Matsuno Y, Takanashi Y, Miyamoto H, Kadota T . Formaldehyde exposure in a gross anatomy laboratory--personal exposure level is higher than indoor concentration. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006; 13(2):120-4. DOI: 10.1065/espr2005.06.265. View

Ochs S, Grotz L, Factorine L, Rodrigues M, Netto A . Occupational exposure to formaldehyde in an institute of morphology in Brazil: a comparison of area and personal sampling. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012; 19(7):2813-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0786-3. View

Akbar-Khanzadeh F, Vaquerano M, Bisesi M . Formaldehyde exposure, acute pulmonary response, and exposure control options in a gross anatomy laboratory. Am J Ind Med. 1994; 26(1):61-75. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700260106. View

Coleman R, Kogan I . An improved low-formaldehyde embalming fluid to preserve cadavers for anatomy teaching. J Anat. 1998; 192 ( Pt 3):443-6. PMC: 1467790. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19230443.x. View

Keil C, Akbar-Khanzadeh F, Konecny K . Characterizing formaldehyde emission rates in a gross anatomy laboratory. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001; 16(10):967-72. DOI: 10.1080/104732201300367227. View

Kurose T, Kodera H, Aoyama H, Kawamata S . Formaldehyde concentration in the air and in cadavers at the gross anatomy laboratory in Hiroshima University. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2005; 53(3-4):33-7. View

Wantke F, Focke M, Hemmer W, Bracun R, Jarisch R, Gotz M . Exposure to formaldehyde and phenol during an anatomy dissecting course: sensitizing potency of formaldehyde in medical students. Allergy. 2000; 55(1):84-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00307.x. View

Tanaka K, Nishiyama K, Yaginuma H, Sasaki A, Maeda T, Kaneko S . [Formaldehyde exposure levels and exposure control measures during an anatomy dissecting course]. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2003; 78(2):43-51. View

Azari M, Asadi P, Jafari M, Soori H, Hosseini V . Occupational exposure of a medical school staff to formaldehyde in tehran. Tanaffos. 2014; 11(3):36-41. PMC: 4153202. View

10.

Uthiravelu P, Saravanan A, Kumar C, Vaithiyanandane V . Pulmonary function test in formalin exposed and nonexposed subjects: A comparative study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7(Suppl 1):S35-9. PMC: 4439703. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155787. View

11.

Arts J, Rennen M, de Heer C . Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006; 44(2):144-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.11.006. View

12.

Takigawa T, Usami M, Yamasaki Y, Wang B, Sakano N, Horike T . Reduction of indoor formaldehyde concentrations and subjective symptoms in a gross anatomy laboratory. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005; 74(6):1027-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-005-0683-2. View

13.

Harving H, Korsgaard J, Pedersen O, Molhave L, Dahl R . Pulmonary function and bronchial reactivity in asthmatics during low-level formaldehyde exposure. Lung. 1990; 168(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02719669. View

14.

Whitehead M, Savoia M . Evaluation of methods to reduce formaldehyde levels of cadavers in the dissection laboratory. Clin Anat. 2007; 21(1):75-81. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20567. View

15.

Kriebel D, Sama S, Cocanour B . Reversible pulmonary responses to formaldehyde. A study of clinical anatomy students. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993; 148(6 Pt 1):1509-15. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.6_Pt_1.1509. View

16.

Lakchayapakorn K, Watchalayarn P . Formaldehyde exposure of medical students and instructors and clinical symptoms during gross anatomy laboratory in Thammasat University. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011; 93 Suppl 7:S92-8. View

17.

Coleman R . Reducing the levels of formaldehyde exposure in gross anatomy laboratories. Anat Rec. 1995; 243(4):531-3. DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092430417. View

18.

Kim S . Environment-friendly adhesives for surface bonding of wood-based flooring using natural tannin to reduce formaldehyde and TVOC emission. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 100(2):744-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.062. View

19.

Yamato H, Nakashima T, Kikuta A, Kunugita N, Arashidani K, Nagafuchi Y . A novel local ventilation system to reduce the levels of formaldehyde exposure during a gross anatomy dissection course and its evaluation using real-time monitoring. J Occup Health. 2005; 47(5):450-3. DOI: 10.1539/joh.47.450. View

20.

Bunkoed O, Davis F, Kanatharana P, Thavarungkul P, Higson S . Sol-gel based sensor for selective formaldehyde determination. Anal Chim Acta. 2010; 659(1-2):251-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.034. View