» Articles » PMID: 26229843

Comparative Study Between Physical Examination, Electroneuromyography and Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Overview
Journal Rev Bras Ortop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Aug 1
PMID 26229843
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity of electromyography and ultrasonography in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), in comparison with physical examination, which is considered to be the gold standard.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the medical files of 56 patients with 70 hands affected by CTS who were attended between March 2010 and June 2012 were reviewed. The study included patients with a clinical diagnosis of CTS. The sensitivity of the complementary examinations was analyzed and compared with physical examination.

Results: Nocturnal symptoms were found in 96.4%, thenar atrophy in 62.5% and abnormal sense of touch in 50%. The sensitivities found were: ultrasonography, 67.1% (95% CI: 55.7%-78.6%); an association of physical examination tests, 95.7% (95% CI: 90.0%-100%); and electromyography, 98.6% (95% CI: 95.7%-100%). The presence of atrophy, abnormalities of the sense of touch and longer-duration symptoms increased the sensitivity of ultrasonography and physical examination.

Conclusion: The sensitivity of ultrasonography for CTS was lower than that of electromyography and physical examination.

Citing Articles

Exploring ultrasound and electromyography for carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis: a comprehensive comparative study and implications for occupational medicine.

Braham S, Moussa A, Bouhoula M, Ben Meriem N, Annen I, Sakly G Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1490873.

PMID: 39722697 PMC: 11668638. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490873.


Carpal tunnel syndrome prediction with machine learning algorithms using anthropometric and strength-based measurement.

Yetis M, Kocaman H, Canli M, Yildirim H, Yetis A, Ceylan I PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0300044.

PMID: 38630703 PMC: 11023568. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300044.


Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Shaukat A, Aamir H, Ahmad Z, Ahmad U Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(4):753-756.

PMID: 38545018 PMC: 10963989. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.4.8332.


The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Bennett O, Sears E Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(7):e5067.

PMID: 37404780 PMC: 10317486. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005067.


Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Provocative Maneuvers for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dabbagh A, MacDermid J, Yong J, Packham T, Grewal R, Boutsikari E Phys Ther. 2023; 103(6).

PMID: 37366626 PMC: 10294560. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad029.


References
1.
Kuschner S, Ebramzadeh E, Johnson D, Brien W, Sherman R . Tinel's sign and Phalen's test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics. 1992; 15(11):1297-302. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19921101-08. View

2.
Fowler J, Maltenfort M, Ilyas A . Ultrasound as a first-line test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(3):932-7. PMC: 3563786. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2662-3. View

3.
Padua L, Lo Monaco M, Valente E, Tonali P . A useful electrophysiologic parameter for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1996; 19(1):48-53. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199601)19:1<48::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-8. View

4.
Kang S, Kwon H, Kim K, Yun H . Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012; 36(1):72-9. PMC: 3309326. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.72. View

5.
Dhong E, Han S, Lee B, Kim W . Correlation of electrodiagnostic findings with subjective symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. 2000; 45(2):127-31. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200045020-00005. View