» Articles » PMID: 26229650

Factors Influencing the Development and Implementation of Advanced Radiographer Practice in Australia - a Qualitative Study Using an Interpretative Phenomenological Approach

Overview
Date 2015 Aug 1
PMID 26229650
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing the implementation or the lack of implementation of advanced practitioner role in Australia.

Methods: This study uses an interpretative phenomenological approach to explore the in-depth real life issues, which surround the advanced practitioner as a solution to radiologist workforce shortages in Australia. Research participants are radiographers, radiation therapists and health managers registered with the Australian Institute of Radiography (AIR) and holding senior professional and AIR Board positions with knowledge of current advanced practice.

Results: In total, seven interviews were conducted revealing education, governance, technical, people issues, change management, government, costs and timing as critical factors influencing advanced practice in Australia.

Conclusions: Seven participants in this study perceived an advanced practice role might have major benefits and a positive impact on the immediate and long-term management of patients. Another finding is the greater respect and appreciation of each other's roles and expertise within the multidisciplinary healthcare team. Engagement is required of the critical stakeholders that have been identified as 'blockers' (radiologists, health departments) as well as identified allies (e.g. emergency clinicians, supportive radiologists, patient advocacy groups). The research supports that the AIR has a role to play for the professional identity of radiographers and shaping the advanced practice role in Australia.

Citing Articles

The phenomenological approach in dentistry - a narrative review.

Vasthare R, Lim Y R A, Bagga A, Nayak P, Bhat B, S S Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2341450.

PMID: 38634343 PMC: 11028029. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2341450.


Comparison of image quality assessments between interventional radiographers and interventional radiologists using digital subtraction angiography.

Nocum D, Robinson J, Halaki M, Bath M, Mekis N, Liang E J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023; 10(2):025501.

PMID: 36910881 PMC: 10005818. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.2.025501.


Intravenous cannulation and administration of contrast media by radiographers: a literature review to guide the training and practice in Zambia.

Bwanga O, Kayembe R, Sichone J Afr Health Sci. 2022; 22(2):629-637.

PMID: 36407373 PMC: 9652686. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.72.


Diagnostic radiographer advanced clinical practice in the United Kingdom - A national cross-sectional survey.

Woznitza N, Pittock L, Elliott J, Snaith B BJR Open. 2021; 3(1):20210003.

PMID: 34381947 PMC: 8320111. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210003.


An analysis of radiographer preliminary image evaluation - A focus on common false negatives.

Alexander-Bates I, Neep M, Davis B, Starkey D J Med Radiat Sci. 2021; 68(3):237-244.

PMID: 33750041 PMC: 8424337. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.466.


References
1.
Smith T, Baird M . Radiographers' role in radiological reporting: a model to support future demand. Med J Aust. 2007; 186(12):629-31. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01080.x. View

2.
Price R, Le Masurier S . Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: A new perspective. Radiography (Lond). 2021; 13(1):18-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2005.11.001. View

3.
Kenny L, Andrews M . Addressing radiology workforce issues. Med J Aust. 2007; 186(12):615-6. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01076.x. View

4.
Koch T . Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. 1993. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 53(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x. View

5.
Blakeley C, Hogg P, Heywood J . Effectiveness of UK radiographer image reading. Radiol Technol. 2008; 79(3):221-6. View