» Articles » PMID: 26223476

Influence of Host Nutritional Condition on Post-infection Traits in the Association Between the Manipulative Acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus Laevis and the Amphipod Gammarus Pulex

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Jul 31
PMID 26223476
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several parasites with complex life-cycles induce phenotypic alterations in their intermediate hosts. According to the host manipulation hypothesis, such phenotypic alterations are supposed to increase the fitness of the parasite at the expense of that of its intermediate hosts through increasing the probability of transmission to next hosts. Although the phenomenon has received a large attention, the proximate factors modulating the occurrence and intensity of host manipulation remain poorly known. It has however, been suggested that the amount of energy reserves in the intermediate host might be a key parameter, although its precise influence on the intensity of manipulation remains unclear. Dietary depletion in the host may also lead to compromise with other parasite traits, such as probability of establishing or growth or virulence.

Methods: Here, we address the question through performing experimental infections of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex with two different populations of the acanthocephalan fish parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis, and manipulation of host nutritional condition. Following exposure, gammarids were given either a "standard" diet (consisting of elm leaves and chironomid larvae) or a "deprived" food treatment (deprived in proteins), and infection parameters were recorded. Once parasites reached the stage at which they become infective to their definitive host, refuge use (a behavioural trait presumably implied in trophic transmission) was assessed, and metabolic rate was measured.

Results: Infected gammarids exposed to the deprived food treatment showed a lower metabolic rate, indicative of a lower body condition, compared to those exposed to the standard food treatment. Parasite size was smaller, and, depending on the population of origin of the parasites, intensity of infection was lower or mortality was higher in deprived hosts. However, food treatment had no effect on either the timing or intensity of behavioural modifications.

Conclusions: Overall, while our results suggest that acanthocephalan parasites develop better in hosts in good condition, no evidence was found for an influence of host nutritional condition on host manipulation by parasites.

Citing Articles

Biological Invasions Affect Resource Processing in Aquatic Ecosystems: The Invasive Amphipod Impacts Detritus Processing through High Abundance Rather than Differential Response to Temperature.

Pile B, Warren D, Hassall C, Brown L, Dunn A Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37372115 PMC: 10295368. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060830.


Increased temperature has no consequence for behavioral manipulation despite effects on both partners in the interaction between a crustacean host and a manipulative parasite.

Labaude S, Cezilly F, De Marco L, Rigaud T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11670.

PMID: 32669670 PMC: 7363812. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68577-z.


Competitive growth, energy allocation, and host modification in the acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus dirus: field data.

Caddigan S, Pfenning A, Sparkes T Parasitol Res. 2016; 116(1):199-206.

PMID: 27726020 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5279-8.


Gene Expression Profile in the Liver of Sheep Infected with Cystic Echinococcosis.

Hui W, Jiang S, Liu X, Ban Q, Chen S, Jia B PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0160000.

PMID: 27467147 PMC: 4965101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160000.


Host manipulation in the face of environmental changes: Ecological consequences.

Labaude S, Rigaud T, Cezilly F Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2016; 4(3):442-51.

PMID: 26835252 PMC: 4699980. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.08.001.


References
1.
Franceschi N, Bollache L, Cornet S, Bauer A, Motreuil S, Rigaud T . Co-variation between the intensity of behavioural manipulation and parasite development time in an acanthocephalan-amphipod system. J Evol Biol. 2010; 23(10):2143-2150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02076.x. View

2.
Thomas F, Brodeur J, Maure F, Franceschi N, Blanchet S, Rigaud T . Intraspecific variability in host manipulation by parasites. Infect Genet Evol. 2011; 11(2):262-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.12.013. View

3.
Sato T, Watanabe K, Kanaiwa M, Niizuma Y, Harada Y, Lafferty K . Nematomorph parasites drive energy flow through a riparian ecosystem. Ecology. 2011; 92(1):201-7. DOI: 10.1890/09-1565.1. View

4.
Dianne L, Perrot-Minnot M, Bauer A, Gaillard M, Leger E, Rigaud T . Protection first then facilitation: a manipulative parasite modulates the vulnerability to predation of its intermediate host according to its own developmental stage. Evolution. 2011; 65(9):2692-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01330.x. View

5.
Shik J, Kaspari M, Yanoviak S . Preliminary assessment of metabolic costs of the nematode Myrmeconema neotropicum on its host, the tropical ant Cephalotes atratus. J Parasitol. 2011; 97(5):958-9. DOI: 10.1645/GE-2735.1. View