» Articles » PMID: 26222545

Challenges from Tuberculosis Diagnosis to Care in Community-Based Active Case Finding Among the Urban Poor in Cambodia: A Mixed-Methods Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 30
PMID 26222545
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While community-based active case finding (ACF) for tuberculosis (TB) holds promise for increasing early case detection among hard-to-reach populations, limited data exist on the acceptability of active screening. We aimed to identify barriers and explore facilitators on the pathway from diagnosis to care among TB patients and health providers.

Methods: Mixed-methods study. We administered a survey questionnaire to, and performed in-depth interviews with, TB patients identified through ACF from poor urban settlements in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Additionally, we conducted focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with community and public health providers involved in ACF, respectively.

Results: Acceptance of home TB screening was strong among key stakeholders due to perceived reductions in access barriers and in direct and indirect patient costs. Privacy and stigma were not an issue. To build trust and facilitate communication, the participation of community representatives alongside health workers was preferred. Most health providers saw ACF as complementary to existing TB services; however, additional workload as a result of ACF was perceived as straining operating capacity at public sector sites. Proximity to a health facility and disease severity were the strongest determinants of prompt care-seeking. The main reasons reported for delays in treatment-seeking were non-acceptance of diagnosis, high indirect costs related to lost income/productivity and transportation expenses, and anticipated side-effects from TB drugs.

Conclusions: TB patients and health providers considered home-based ACF complementary to facility-based TB screening. Strong engagement with community representatives was believed critical in gaining access to high risk communities. The main barriers to prompt treatment uptake in ACF were refusal of diagnosis, high indirect costs, and anticipated treatment side-effects. A patient-centred approach and community involvement were essential in mitigating barriers to care in marginalised communities.

Citing Articles

Finding the missed millions: innovations to bring tuberculosis diagnosis closer to key populations.

Byrne R, Wingfield T, Adams E, Banu S, Bimba J, Codlin A BMC Glob Public Health. 2024; 2(1):33.

PMID: 39681964 PMC: 11622979. DOI: 10.1186/s44263-024-00063-4.


Community views on active case finding for tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Taylor M, Medley N, Van Wyk S, Oliver S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 3:CD014756.

PMID: 38511668 PMC: 10955804. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014756.pub2.


Facilitators and barriers to tuberculosis active case findings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Fenta M, Ogundijo O, Warsame A, Belay A BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):515.

PMID: 37550614 PMC: 10405492. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08502-7.


Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.

Feasey H, Burke R, Nliwasa M, Chaisson L, Golub J, Naufal F PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 1(12):e0000088.

PMID: 36962123 PMC: 10021508. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000088.


Sputum smears quality inspection using an ensemble feature extraction approach.

Kiflie A, Tesema Tufa G, Salau A Front Public Health. 2023; 10:1032467.

PMID: 36761323 PMC: 9905811. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1032467.


References
1.
Mao T, Okada K, Yamada N, Peou S, Ota M, Saint S . Cross-sectional studies of tuberculosis prevalence in Cambodia between 2002 and 2011. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92(8):573-81. PMC: 4147411. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.13.131581. View

2.
Raviglione M . The new Stop TB Strategy and the Global Plan to Stop TB, 2006-2015. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(5):327. PMC: 2636638. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.038513. View

3.
Ayles H, Muyoyeta M, Du Toit E, Schaap A, Floyd S, Simwinga M . Effect of household and community interventions on the burden of tuberculosis in southern Africa: the ZAMSTAR community-randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 382(9899):1183-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61131-9. View

4.
Floyd K, Skeva J, Nyirenda T, Gausi F, Salaniponi F . Cost and cost-effectiveness of increased community and primary care facility involvement in tuberculosis care in Lilongwe District, Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(9 Suppl 1):S29-37. View

5.
Sagbakken M, Frich J, Bjune G . Barriers and enablers in the management of tuberculosis treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:11. PMC: 2257959. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-11. View