Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis of Data From Multispecialty Resident Focus Groups

Overview

Journal J Grad Med Educ

Date 2015 Jul 30

PMID 26221437

Citations 33

Authors

Shalini T Reddy

Matthew H Zegarek

H Barrett Fromme

Michael S Ryan

Sarah-Anne Schumann

Ilene B Harris

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of feedback, the literature suggests that there is inadequate feedback in graduate medical education.

Objective: We explored barriers and facilitators that residents in anesthesiology, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery experience with giving and receiving feedback during their clinical training.

Methods: Residents from 3 geographically diverse teaching institutions were recruited to participate in focus groups in 2012. Open-ended questions prompted residents to describe their experiences with giving and receiving feedback, and discuss facilitators and barriers. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the constant comparative method associated with a grounded theory approach.

Results: A total of 19 residents participated in 1 of 3 focus groups. Five major themes related to feedback were identified: teacher factors, learner factors, feedback process, feedback content, and educational context. Unapproachable attendings, time pressures due to clinical work, and discomfort with giving negative feedback were cited as major barriers in the feedback process. Learner engagement in the process was a major facilitator in the feedback process.

Conclusions: Residents provided insights for improving the feedback process based on their dual roles as teachers and learners. Time pressures in the learning environment may be mitigated by efforts to improve the quality of teacher-learner relationships. Forms for collecting written feedback should be augmented by faculty development to ensure meaningful use. Efforts to improve residents' comfort with giving feedback and encouraging learners to engage in the feedback process may foster an environment conducive to increasing feedback.

Citing Articles

Narrative comments in internal medicine clerkship evaluations: room to grow.

Crumbley C, Szauter K, Karnath B, Sonstein L, Belalcazar L, Qureshi S Med Educ Online. 2025; 30(1):2471434.

PMID: 39998485 PMC: 11864032. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2471434.

Exploring the Relationship Between Clinical Supervision and Well-Being in the Otolaryngology Residency Board in Saudi Arabia.

Alessa M, Eltouny S, Alsaab H, Abed R Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942517 PMC: 11817485. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030328.

"Well I Failed, but I Have No Idea Why"…: Experiences of Feedback After High-Stakes Summative Specialist Medical Examination in Ophthalmology.

Jessup B, Allen P, Kirschbaum M, Khanal S, Baker-Smith V, Graham B J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024; 11:23821205241286288.

PMID: 39497906 PMC: 11533217. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241286288.

Through the Looking Glass: Comparing Hospitalists' and Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Feedback.

Raikhel A, Starks H, Berger G, Redinger J Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63459.

PMID: 39077307 PMC: 11285250. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63459.

Translation and psychometric evaluation of composite feedback-seeking behavior questionnaire among Iranian medical residents.

Shavoun A, Mirzazadeh A, Kashani H, Raeeskarami S, Gandomkar R BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):594.

PMID: 38811982 PMC: 11137997. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05586-w.

References

Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J . Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006; 13(3):275-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x. View

Ericsson K . Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15(11):988-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x. View

Teunissen P, Stapel D, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F . Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009; 84(7):910-7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a858ad. View

Bing-You R, Trowbridge R . Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 2009; 302(12):1330-1. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1393. View

Archer J . State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010; 44(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x. View

Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T . Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011; 86(9):1120-7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226abdd. View

Milan F, Dyche L, Fletcher J . "How am I doing?" Teaching medical students to elicit feedback during their clerkships. Med Teach. 2011; 33(11):904-10. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.588732. View

Rogers D, Boehler M, Schwind C, Meier A, Wall J, Brenner M . Engaging medical students in the feedback process. Am J Surg. 2011; 203(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.009. View

Eva K, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K . Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011; 17(1):15-26. PMC: 3274671. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7. View

10.

Artino Jr A, Holmboe E, Durning S . Can achievement emotions be used to better understand motivation, learning, and performance in medical education?. Med Teach. 2012; 34(3):240-4. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.643265. View

11.

Watling C, Lingard L . Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: the influence of participants' perceptions of the process. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 17(2):183-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9223-x. View

12.

Pelgrim E, Kramer A, Mokkink H, van der Vleuten C . The process of feedback in workplace-based assessment: organisation, delivery, continuity. Med Educ. 2012; 46(6):604-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04266.x. View

13.

Murdoch-Eaton D, Sargeant J . Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback. Med Educ. 2012; 46(7):711-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x. View

14.

Auger K, Landrigan C, Gonzalez del Rey J, Sieplinga K, Sucharew H, Simmons J . Better rested, but more stressed? Evidence of the effects of resident work hour restrictions. Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12(4):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.02.006. View

15.

Antiel R, Reed D, Van Arendonk K, Wightman S, Hall D, Porterfield J . Effects of duty hour restrictions on core competencies, education, quality of life, and burnout among general surgery interns. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148(5):448-55. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1368. View

16.

Stalmeijer R, Dolmans D, Snellen-Balendong H, van Santen-Hoeufft M, Wolfhagen I, Scherpbier A . Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced clinical teachers. Acad Med. 2013; 88(6):861-5. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828fff12. View

17.

Dijksterhuis M, Schuwirth L, Braat D, Teunissen P, Scheele F . A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013; 35(8):e1396-402. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.756576. View

18.

Delva D, Sargeant J, Miller S, Holland J, Brown P, LeBlanc C . Encouraging residents to seek feedback. Med Teach. 2013; 35(12):e1625-31. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.806791. View

19.

Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S . Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach. 2005; 27(5):470-2. DOI: 10.1080/0142590500129183. View

20.

Brasher A, Chowdhry S, Hauge L, Prinz R . Medical students' perceptions of resident teaching: have duty hours regulations had an impact?. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(4):548-53. PMC: 1402351. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000184192.74000.6a. View