» Articles » PMID: 26219014

Dosimetric Comparison of Acuros XB with Collapsed Cone Convolution/superposition and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Thoracic Spinal Metastases

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 29
PMID 26219014
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the recent Eclipse Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation engine with the Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) dose calculation algorithm and the Eclipse anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) treatment planning of thoracic spinal (T-spine) metastases using IMRT and VMAT delivery techniques. The three commissioned dose engines (CCC, AAA, and AXB) were validated with ion chamber and EBT2 film measurements utilizing a heterogeneous slab-geometry water phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Step-and-shoot IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were developed and optimized for eight patients in Pinnacle, following our institutional SAbR protocol for spinal metastases. The CCC algorithm, with heterogeneity corrections, was used for dose calculations. These plans were then exported to Eclipse and recalculated using the AAA and AXB dose calculation algorithms. Various dosimetric parameters calculated with CCC and AAA were compared to that of the AXB calculations. In regions receiving above 50% of prescription dose, the calculated CCC mean dose is 3.1%-4.1% higher than that of AXB calculations for IMRT plans and 2.8%-3.5% higher for VMAT plans, while the calculated AAA mean dose is 1.5%-2.4% lower for IMRT and 1.2%-1.6% lower for VMAT. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for most GTV and PTV indices between the CCC and AXB calculations for IMRT and VMAT, while differences between the AAA and AXB calculations were not statistically significant. For T-spine SAbR treatment planning, the CCC calculations give a statistically significant overestimation of target dose compared to AXB. AAA underestimates target dose with no statistical significance compared to AXB. Further study is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings.

Citing Articles

Dosimetric verification of four dose calculation algorithms for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Hirashima H, Nakamura M, Nakamura K, Matsuo Y, Mizowaki T J Radiat Res. 2023; 65(1):109-118.

PMID: 37996097 PMC: 10803157. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad086.


Impact of the Acuros XB spatial discretization error on ArcCHECK VMAT QA for small-field SBRT.

He C, Pant A, Le A J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(9):e14100.

PMID: 37563870 PMC: 10476976. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14100.


Estimating cancer risks due to whole lungs low dose radiotherapy with different techniques for treating COVID-19 pneumonia.

Banaei A, Hashemi B, Bakhshandeh M Radiat Oncol. 2022; 17(1):10.

PMID: 35057839 PMC: 8771186. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01971-7.


Dose calculation and reporting with a linear Boltzman transport equation solver in vertebral SABR.

Hardcastle N, Hughes J, Siva S, Kron T Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021; 45(1):43-48.

PMID: 34813052 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01076-1.


A comparative analysis of Acuros XB and the analytical anisotropic algorithm for volumetric modulation arc therapy.

Srivastava R, Basta K, De Gersem W, De Wagter C Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(3):481-488.

PMID: 34277105 PMC: 8281916. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0050.


References
1.
Boyer A, Schultheiss T . Effects of dosimetric and clinical uncertainty on complication-free local tumor control. Radiother Oncol. 1988; 11(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90046-1. View

2.
Gros S, Descovich M, Barani I, Ma L . SU-E-T-446: Effect of Dose Calculation Grid Size Variability on the Specification of Spinal Cord Dose Tolerance for Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Med Phys. 2017; 39(6Part17):3807. DOI: 10.1118/1.4735535. View

3.
Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Clivio A, Vanetti E, Cozzi L . On the dosimetric impact of inhomogeneity management in the Acuros XB algorithm for breast treatment. Radiat Oncol. 2011; 6:103. PMC: 3170219. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-103. View

4.
Lloyd S, Ansbacher W . Evaluation of an analytic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for high-density inhomogeneities. Med Phys. 2013; 40(1):011707. DOI: 10.1118/1.4769419. View

5.
Petillion S, Swinnen A, Defraene G, Verhoeven K, Weltens C, Van Den Heuvel F . The photon dose calculation algorithm used in breast radiotherapy has significant impact on the parameters of radiobiological models. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(4):259–269. PMC: 5875495. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4853. View