» Articles » PMID: 26218470

Effect of Proton-conduction in Electrolyte on Electric Efficiency of Multi-stage Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Jul 29
PMID 26218470
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are promising electrochemical devices that enable the highest fuel-to-electricity conversion efficiencies under high operating temperatures. The concept of multi-stage electrochemical oxidation using SOFCs has been proposed and studied over the past several decades for further improving the electrical efficiency. However, the improvement is limited by fuel dilution downstream of the fuel flow. Therefore, evolved technologies are required to achieve considerably higher electrical efficiencies. Here we present an innovative concept for a critically-high fuel-to-electricity conversion efficiency of up to 85% based on the lower heating value (LHV), in which a high-temperature multi-stage electrochemical oxidation is combined with a proton-conducting solid electrolyte. Switching a solid electrolyte material from a conventional oxide-ion conducting material to a proton-conducting material under the high-temperature multi-stage electrochemical oxidation mechanism has proven to be highly advantageous for the electrical efficiency. The DC efficiency of 85% (LHV) corresponds to a net AC efficiency of approximately 76% (LHV), where the net AC efficiency refers to the transmission-end AC efficiency. This evolved concept will yield a considerably higher efficiency with a much smaller generation capacity than the state-of-the-art several tens-of-MW-class most advanced combined cycle (MACC).

Citing Articles

Mn Additive Improves Zr Grain Boundary Diffusion for Sintering of a Y-Doped BaZrO Proton Conductor.

Heo S, Harvey S, Norman A, Rahman M, Singh P, Zakutayev A ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(9):11646-11655.

PMID: 38387025 PMC: 10921378. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c16359.


Comparison of electrochemical impedance spectra for electrolyte-supported solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs).

Sumi H, Shimada H, Yamaguchi Y, Mizutani Y, Okuyama Y, Amezawa K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10622.

PMID: 34012004 PMC: 8134428. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90211-9.


Proton Conduction in Grain-Boundary-Free Oxygen-Deficient BaFeO Thin Films.

Benes A, Molinari A, Witte R, Kruk R, Brotz J, Chellali R Materials (Basel). 2017; 11(1).

PMID: 29286321 PMC: 5793550. DOI: 10.3390/ma11010052.

References
1.
Yang L, Wang S, Blinn K, Liu M, Liu Z, Cheng Z . Enhanced sulfur and coking tolerance of a mixed ion conductor for SOFCs: BaZr(0.1)Ce(0.7)Y(0.2-x)Yb(x)O(3-delta). Science. 2009; 326(5949):126-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174811. View

2.
Shao Z, Haile S, Ahn J, Ronney P, Zhan Z, Barnett S . A thermally self-sustained micro solid-oxide fuel-cell stack with high power density. Nature. 2005; 435(7043):795-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature03673. View

3.
Wachsman E, Lee K . Lowering the temperature of solid oxide fuel cells. Science. 2011; 334(6058):935-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204090. View

4.
Kannan R, Singh K, Gill S, Furstenhaupt T, Thangadurai V . Chemically stable proton conducting doped BaCeO₃ -no more fear to SOFC wastes. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:2138. PMC: 3701165. DOI: 10.1038/srep02138. View

5.
Steele B, Heinzel A . Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature. 2001; 414(6861):345-52. DOI: 10.1038/35104620. View