» Articles » PMID: 26217398

Vitamin D Assessment in Primary Care: Changing Patterns of Testing

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 29
PMID 26217398
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over recent years there has been increased interest in the disease burden associated with vitamin D deficiency. This, combined with recognition that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is high in the UK, has led to increased requests for vitamin D assessment from primary care clinicians.

Setting: A primary care cohort in Liverpool.

Question: How has the usefulness of vitamin D testing changed over time in identifying deficiency?

Methods: Vitamin D results from primary care practices in Liverpool were collected between 2007 and 2012, inclusive. Results were allocated to six cohorts based on year of request and each was grouped into three categories (adequate, insufficient and deficient).

Results: Vitamin D results of 9460 (74%) first tests and 3263 (26%) retests were analysed. Total number of requests increased 11-fold, from 503 in 2007 to 5552 in 2012. Overall 42% of first-test results were deficient (< 30 nmol). With each incremental year, more cases of vitamin D deficiency were detected - but the odds of detecting vitamin D deficiency decreased.

Conclusions: An exponential increase in the number of vitamin D requests was observed over this six-year period. Although more patients with vitamin deficiency were identified, the increased number of tests represents a significant cost to health services. Moreover, the practice of retesting too soon after treatment can be inappropriate. There is a need to develop clear guidance for assessing vitamin D status in primary care.

Citing Articles

Ukrainian Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults.

Grygorieva N, Tronko M, Kovalenko V, Komisarenko S, Tatarchuk T, Dedukh N Nutrients. 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38257163 PMC: 10820145. DOI: 10.3390/nu16020270.


Intense Testing and Use of Vitamin D Supplements Leads to Slow Improvement in Vitamin D Adequacy Rates: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Real-World Data.

Paparodis R, Bantouna D, Karvounis E, Zoupas I, Livadas S, Angelopoulos N Nutrients. 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201941 PMC: 10780961. DOI: 10.3390/nu16010111.


Cost analysis of 25-hydroxy vitamin D tests in Turkiye with big data: A cross-sectional study.

Ulgu M, Caglayan M, Ata N, Sonmez C, Senes M, Gulbahar O North Clin Istanb. 2023; 10(5):618-625.

PMID: 37829737 PMC: 10565744. DOI: 10.14744/nci.2023.42899.


Vitamin D Metabolites: Analytical Challenges and Clinical Relevance.

Alonso N, Zelzer S, Eibinger G, Herrmann M Calcif Tissue Int. 2022; 112(2):158-177.

PMID: 35238975 PMC: 8892115. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-00961-5.


Golden opportunity for intervention? Identifying vitamin D deficiency in patients with substance use disorders in hospital.

Smith E, Gee S, OBrien G, Vicente P, Griffith R, Patel R BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35165098 PMC: 8845314. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001484.


References
1.
Engelsen O, Brustad M, Aksnes L, Lund E . Daily duration of vitamin D synthesis in human skin with relation to latitude, total ozone, altitude, ground cover, aerosols and cloud thickness. Photochem Photobiol. 2005; 81(6):1287-90. DOI: 10.1562/2004-11-19-RN-375. View

2.
Wortsman J, Matsuoka L, Chen T, Lu Z, Holick M . Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 72(3):690-3. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.690. View

3.
Close G, Leckey J, Patterson M, Bradley W, Owens D, Fraser W . The effects of vitamin D(3) supplementation on serum total 25[OH]D concentration and physical performance: a randomised dose-response study. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47(11):692-6. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091735. View

4.
Pal B, Shaw N . Rickets resurgence in the United Kingdom: improving antenatal management in Asians. J Pediatr. 2001; 139(2):337-8. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.114877. View

5.
Pearce S, Cheetham T . Diagnosis and management of vitamin D deficiency. BMJ. 2010; 340:b5664. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b5664. View