» Articles » PMID: 26216046

A Cost Analysis of the American Board of Internal Medicine's Maintenance-of-Certification Program

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Jul 29
PMID 26216046
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2014, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) substantially increased the requirements and fees for its maintenance-of-certification (MOC) program. Faced with mounting criticism, the ABIM suspended certain content requirements in February 2015 but retained the increased fees and number of modules. An objective appraisal of the cost of MOC would help inform upcoming consultations about MOC reform.

Objective: To estimate the total cost of the 2015 version of the MOC program ("2015 MOC") and the incremental cost relative to the 2013 version ("2013 MOC").

Design: Decision analytic model.

Data Sources: Published literature.

Target Population: All ABIM-certified U.S. physicians.

Time Horizon: 10 years (2015 to 2024).

Perspective: Societal.

Intervention: 2015 MOC.

Outcome Measures: Testing costs (ABIM fees) and time costs (monetary value of physician time).

Results Of Base-case Analysis: Internists will incur an average of $23 607 (95% CI, $5380 to $66 383) in MOC costs over 10 years, ranging from $16 725 for general internists to $40 495 for hematologists-oncologists. Time costs account for 90% of MOC costs. Cumulatively, 2015 MOC will cost $5.7 billion over 10 years, $1.2 billion more than 2013 MOC. This includes $5.1 billion in time costs (resulting from 32.7 million physician-hours spent on MOC) and $561 million in testing costs.

Results Of Sensitivity Analysis: Costs are sensitive to time spent on MOC and MOC credits obtainable from current continuing education activities.

Limitation: Precise estimates of time required for MOC are not available.

Conclusion: The ABIM MOC program will generate considerable costs, predominantly due to demands on physician time. A rigorous evaluation of its effect on clinical and economic outcomes is warranted to balance potential gains in health care quality and efficiency against the high costs identified in this study.

Primary Funding Source: University of California, San Francisco, and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Citing Articles

The Next Era of Assessment: Building a Trustworthy Assessment System.

Caretta-Weyer H, Smirnova A, Barone M, Frank J, Hernandez-Boussard T, Levinson D Perspect Med Educ. 2024; 13(1):12-23.

PMID: 38274558 PMC: 10809864. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1110.


Research Initiative Supporting Excellence at the University of Cincinnati (RISE-UC): A Program to Develop and Support Research-Active Faculty Members.

Haworth K, Niederhausen K, Smith E, Sadayappan S, Wess Y, Rubinstein J Acad Med. 2023; 98(10):1120-1130.

PMID: 37200479 PMC: 10516163. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005270.


Costs and Benefits of Initial Certification for Emergency Medicine Residency Graduates.

Baren J, Beeson M, Chudnofsky C, Goyal D, Kowalenko T, Mallory M J Grad Med Educ. 2019; 11(6):649-653.

PMID: 31871563 PMC: 6919176. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00334.1.


Evaluating the Perception Among Rheumatologists of Maintenance of Board Certification in the US.

Sawalha A, Coit P Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018; 71(3):337-342.

PMID: 30570838 PMC: 6692078. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23823.


How Robust Are Studies in the American Board of Emergency Medicine Maintenance of Certification Lifelong Learning and Self-assessment? An Examination of Fragility and Bias of Included Randomized Controlled Trials.

Davis P, Butler M, Magee K, Thoma B, Nickson C, Trueger N AEM Educ Train. 2018; 1(4):280-286.

PMID: 30051045 PMC: 6001615. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10045.