Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive Vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)-or MI-TLIF-has been increasing in prevalence compared with open TLIF (O-TLIF) procedures. The use of MI-TLIF is an evolving technique with conflicting reports in the literature about outcomes.
Objective: To investigate the impact of MI-TLIF in comparison with O-TLIF for early and late outcomes by using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain (VAS-back) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary end points include blood loss, operative time, radiation exposure, length of stay, fusion rates, and complications between the 2 procedures.
Methods: During August 2014, a systematic literature search was performed identifying 987 articles. Of these, 30 met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed by using both pooled and subset analyses based on study type.
Results: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that MI-TLIF reduced blood loss (P < .001), length of stay (P < .001), and complications (P = .001) but increased radiation exposure (P < .001). No differences were found in fusion rate (P = .61) and operative time (P = .34). A decrease in late VAS-back scores was demonstrated for MI TLIF (P < .001), but no differences were found in early VAS-back, early ODI, and late ODI.
Conclusion: MI-TLIF is associated with reduced blood loss, decreased length of stay, decreased complication rates, and increased radiation exposure. The rates of fusion and operative time are similar between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF. Differences in long-term outcomes in MI-TLIF vs O-TLIF are inconclusive and require more research, particularly in the form of large, multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled trials.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence intervalMCID, minimal clinically important differenceMI-TLIF, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionODI, Oswestry Disability IndexO-TLIF, open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionVAS, Visual Analog Scale.
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinal Fusion Surgery for Spondylolisthesis Treatment.
Munazzam S, Rai V, Asfandyar Q, Khan S, Mohammed C J Orthop Case Rep. 2025; 15(1):224-234.
PMID: 39801843 PMC: 11723757. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i01.5184.
Huang C, Brena K, Tabarestani T, Bardeesi A, Paturu M, Spears H J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(3):403-415.
PMID: 39399073 PMC: 11467274. DOI: 10.21037/jss-24-29.
Tang Z, Tan J, Shen M, Yang H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):713.
PMID: 39237948 PMC: 11375995. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07825-z.
Ifthekar S, Ahuja K, Mittal S, Yadav G, Chaturvedi J, Sarkar B Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(5):558-566.
PMID: 38694702 PMC: 11058730. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01123-5.
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
Saela S, Pompliano M, Varghese J, Sinha K, Faloon M, Emami A JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024; 13(4).
PMID: 38380431 PMC: 10878552. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00065.