» Articles » PMID: 26208498

Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of a New Articulating 5-mm Endoscopic Linear Stapler

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Jul 26
PMID 26208498
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel 5-mm laparoscopic linear stapler in clinical gastrointestinal surgical applications.

Methods: A prospective, single-arm study with an open enrollment of subjects requiring stapling of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was performed. The study endpoints were the number of complications and technical failures associated with the use of a novel stapler when compared to similar events with conventional staplers as described in the medical literature.

Results: Seven centers enrolled 160 subjects, 150 of which were followed up to at least 30 days postoperatively. Intraoperative success: In 423 deployments, there were two staple line leaks and five staple line bleeds, all of which were intraoperatively resolved. In addition, incomplete staple lines were noted as a result of user error (n = 15) or device-related issues (n = 22), all of which were immediately resolved and none of which resulted in a complication or a change of the surgical procedure. Late outcomes: A total of 13 surgical complications in 160 patients were related to a GI transection or anastomosis, 12 of which related to a hand-sewn anastomosis or use of other commercially available staplers. One event (1/153, 0.065 %) on POD 1, involving bleeding of the staple line, was felt to be related to the use of the new stapler.

Conclusion: The study confirmed that the new device was user-friendly (9 % incidence of problems firing the device), reliable (3 % device failures) and safe (<1 % complication rate related to the stapler). Based on these results, it would seem that this new 5-mm stapler is a safe and effective alternative to standard 12-mm staplers.

Citing Articles

Totally laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with hand‑sewn Roux‑en‑Y reconstruction in a pediatric population.

Liu Q, Yu Q, Fu J, Li P Exp Ther Med. 2024; 28(3):344.

PMID: 39006457 PMC: 11240874. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12633.


A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.

Lobe T, Panait L, Dapri G, Denk P, Pechman D, Milone L Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(10):7077-7091.

PMID: 35986221 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09467-5.


Application of stapling devices in liver surgery: Current status and future prospects.

Yao D, Wu S World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(31):7091-8.

PMID: 27610019 PMC: 4988303. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i31.7091.


A Single Institution Review of Initial Application of a 5-mm Stapler.

Rogers A, Zens T, Kohler J, Le H, Nichol P, Leys C J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26(8):660-2.

PMID: 27398952 PMC: 5583546. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0228.

References
1.
Wittgrove A, Clark G . Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y- 500 patients: technique and results, with 3-60 month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2000; 10(3):233-9. DOI: 10.1381/096089200321643511. View

2.
Choy P, Bissett I, Docherty J, Parry B, Merrie A . Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (3):CD004320. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub2. View

3.
Dresel A, Kuhn J, Westmoreland M, Talaasen L, McCarty T . Establishing a laparoscopic gastric bypass program. Am J Surg. 2002; 184(6):617-20; discussion 620. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01098-x. View

4.
Matthews B, Sing R, DeLegge M, Ponsky J, Heniford B . Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Surg. 2000; 179(6):476-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00393-7. View

5.
Blumetti J, Luu M, Sarosi G, Hartless K, McFarlin J, Parker B . Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered?. Surgery. 2007; 142(5):704-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.012. View