The Reliability of a Smartphone Goniometer Application Compared with a Traditional Goniometer for Measuring First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Dorsiflexion

Overview

Journal J Foot Ankle Res

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Jul 25

PMID 26207142

Citations 12

Authors

Simon J Otter

Brunilda Agalliu

Nicola Baer

Georgie Hales

Katrina Harvey

Keeley James

Richard Keating

Warren McConnell

Rachel Nelson

Saddaf Qureshi

Steven Ryan

Abigail St John

Heather Waddington

Katie Warren

Duane Wong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ.

Methods: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability.

Results: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)).

Conclusions: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur.

Citing Articles

Validity Analysis of Monocular Human Pose Estimation Models Interfaced with a Mobile Application for Assessing Upper Limb Range of Motion.

Moreira R, Teixeira S, Fialho R, Miranda A, Lima L, Carvalho M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771719 PMC: 11679233. DOI: 10.3390/s24247983.

The Intrarater and Interrater Reliability and Validity of Universal Goniometer, Digital Inclinometer, and Smartphone Application Measuring Range of Motion in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Acar S, Aljumaa H, Sevik K, Karatosun V, Unver B Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(6):732-739.

PMID: 38812867 PMC: 11130096. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01129-z.

Reliability and concurrent validity of mobile health technology for patient self-monitoring in physical rehabilitation.

Pottorf O, Lee D, Czujko P JSES Int. 2022; 6(3):506-511.

PMID: 35572423 PMC: 9091929. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.002.

Reliability and validity of lower limb joint range of motion measurements using a smartphone.

Miyachi Y, Ito M, Furuta K, Ban R, Hanamura S, Kamiya M Nagoya J Med Sci. 2022; 84(1):7-18.

PMID: 35392008 PMC: 8971043. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.84.1.7.

Impact of bed height on the biomechanics of healthcare professionals during chest compressions on the neonate: a descriptive pilot study.

Parent-Nichols J, Perez J, Witherell B, McWilliam P, Halamek L, Kent N BMJ Open. 2021; 11(9):e047666.

PMID: 34531209 PMC: 8449956. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047666.

References

Shin S, Ro D, Lee O, Oh J, Kim S . Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Man Ther. 2012; 17(4):298-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.010. View

Cadogan A, Laslett M, Hing W, McNair P, Williams M . Reliability of a new hand-held dynamometer in measuring shoulder range of motion and strength. Man Ther. 2010; 16(1):97-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2010.05.005. View

Valentine R, Lewis J . Intraobserver reliability of 4 physiologic movements of the shoulder in subjects with and without symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9):1242-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.008. View

Menz H, Munteanu S . Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 44(8):1061-6. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh687. View

Hetherington V, Carnett J, Patterson B . Motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Foot Surg. 1989; 28(1):13-9. View

Jones A, Sealey R, Crowe M, Gordon S . Concurrent validity and reliability of the Simple Goniometer iPhone app compared with the Universal Goniometer. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014; 30(7):512-6. DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2014.900835. View

Hoving J, Buchbinder R, Green S, Forbes A, Bellamy N, Brand C . How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement?. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002; 61(7):612-6. PMC: 1754152. DOI: 10.1136/ard.61.7.612. View

Lea R, Gerhardt J . Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(5):784-98. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00017. View

Bryant A, Tinley P, Singer K . A comparison of radiographic measurements in normal, hallux valgus, and hallux limitus feet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000; 39(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1067-2516(00)80062-9. View

10.

Buell T, Green D, Risser J . Measurement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1988; 78(9):439-48. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-78-9-439. View

11.

Menadue C, Raymond J, Kilbreath S, Refshauge K, Adams R . Reliability of two goniometric methods of measuring active inversion and eversion range of motion at the ankle. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7:60. PMC: 1550229. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-60. View

12.

Green S, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Bellamy N . A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability. Arthritis Care Res. 1998; 11(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1002/art.1790110108. View

13.

Nawoczenski D, Baumhauer J, Umberger B . Relationship between clinical measurements and motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(3):370-6. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199903000-00009. View

14.

Kailas A, Chong C, Watanabe F . From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010; 1(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1109/MPUL.2010.937244. View

15.

Dananberg H . Functional hallux limitus and its relationship to gait efficiency. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986; 76(11):648-52. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-76-11-648. View

16.

Taranto M, Taranto J, Bryant A, Singer K . Radiographic investigation of angular and linear measurements including first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and rearfoot to forefoot axis angle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005; 44(3):190-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.02.011. View

17.

Watkins M, Riddle D, Lamb R, Personius W . Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1991; 71(2):90-6; discussion 96-7. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.90. View

18.

Coughlin M, Shurnas P . Hallux rigidus. Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(11):2072-88. View

19.

Terry M . Medical Apps for Smartphones. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.9999. View

20.

Hetherington V, Johnson R, Albritton J . Necessary dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. J Foot Surg. 1990; 29(3):218-22. View