» Articles » PMID: 26204322

Mobile Videoconferencing Apps for Telemedicine

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 24
PMID 26204322
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The quality and performance of several videoconferencing applications (apps) tested on iOS (Apple, Cupertino, CA) and Android (Google, Mountain View, CA) mobile platforms using Wi-Fi (802.11), third-generation (3G), and fourth-generation (4G) cellular networks are described.

Materials And Methods: The tests were done to determine how well apps perform compared with videoconferencing software installed on computers or with more traditional videoconferencing using dedicated hardware. The rationale for app assessment and the testing methodology are described.

Results: Findings are discussed in relation to operating system platform (iOS or Android) for which the apps were designed and the type of network (Wi-Fi, 3G, or 4G) used. The platform, network, and apps interact, and it is impossible to discuss videoconferencing experienced on mobile devices in relation to one of these factors without referencing the others.

Conclusions: Apps for mobile devices can vary significantly from other videoconferencing software or hardware. App performance increased over the testing period due to improvements in network infrastructure and how apps manage bandwidth.

Citing Articles

Touching Technology-Parents' Experiences of Remote Consultations for Children With Severe Congenital Cardiac Conditions: Quasi-Experimental Cohort Study.

McCullough J, Sinclair M, Gillender J, McCrossan B, Slater P, Browne R JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024; 7:e54598.

PMID: 39437148 PMC: 11521195. DOI: 10.2196/54598.


Telemedicine Preparedness Among Older Adults With Chronic Illness: Survey of Primary Care Patients.

Ufholz K, Sheon A, Bhargava D, Rao G JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(7):e35028.

PMID: 35896013 PMC: 9377459. DOI: 10.2196/35028.


Efficacy of Telemedicine Utilization for Cardiac Outpatients' Care during the Pandemic of COVID-19: A Large Center Experience in the Wave of the Pandemic.

Alhejily W Int J Telemed Appl. 2022; 2022:4156436.

PMID: 35601051 PMC: 9115730. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4156436.


Physicians' Attitudes Toward Telemedicine Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.

AlHajri N, Simsekler M, Alfalasi B, Alhashmi M, Alghatrif M, Balalaa N JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9(6):e29251.

PMID: 34001497 PMC: 8171285. DOI: 10.2196/29251.


Telemedicine in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Neurosurgical Perspective.

Blue R, Yang A, Zhou C, De Ravin E, Teng C, Arguelles G World Neurosurg. 2020; 139:549-557.

PMID: 32426065 PMC: 7229725. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.066.

References
1.
Anderson C, Henner T, Burkey J . Tablet computers in support of rural and frontier clinical practice. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82(11):1046-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.006. View

2.
Liu W, Zhang K, Locatis C, Ackerman M . Internet-based videoconferencing coder/decoders and tools for telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2011; 17(5):358-62. PMC: 3135256. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0193. View

3.
Weinstein R, Lopez A, Joseph B, Erps K, Holcomb M, Barker G . Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014; 127(3):183-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.032. View

4.
Liu W, Zhang K, Locatis C, Ackerman M . Cloud and traditional videoconferencing technology for telemedicine and distance learning. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21(5):422-6. PMC: 4432776. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0121. View

5.
Kim D, Yoo S, Park I, Choa M, Bae K, Kim Y . A mobile telemedicine system for remote consultation in cases of acute stroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2009; 15(2):102-7. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080713. View