» Articles » PMID: 26203743

Visual Recovery and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty Grafts—A Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Cornea
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Jul 24
PMID 26203743
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess visual recovery and donor cell survival after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for the repair of failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) grafts.

Methods: Best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity results after DSAEK were compared with best-ever documented visual acuity (BDVA) results obtained with the previous PK graft in a prospective cohort study. Donor cell survival after DSAEK for PK repair was compared with cell survival after DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Differences in the logMAR best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity and endothelial cell loss rates were calculated.

Results: Twenty-eight eyes with DSAEK for PK repair were identified, 21 of which lacked vision-limiting comorbidities. The mean follow-up was 18.4 ± 10.6 months. At 3 months postoperatively, 10/21 eyes (48%) regained their BDVA. By 24 months, only 14% remained with 0.2 logMAR below their BDVA. Endothelial cell counts decreased significantly faster in patients with DSAEK for failed PK (P = 0.024) or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (P = 0.018) than in patients with DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Conclusions: DSAEK for the restoration of failed PK grafts promotes rapid visual recovery within the visual limits of the previous PK graft. Increased endothelial cell loss is noted relative to other DSAEK indications, which may result in earlier endothelial graft failure in renovated PK.

Citing Articles

Indications and types of keratoplasties: Trends in the past 10 years (2011-2020) in Eastern India.

Kaur A, Parida P, Priyadarshini S, Mohanty A, Sahu S, Das S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 71(9):3166-3170.

PMID: 37602603 PMC: 10565916. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2636_22.


Changing trends in corneal transplantation: a national review of current practices in the Republic of Ireland.

Iselin K, Greenan E, Hynes C, Shaw S, Fulcher T, Power W Ir J Med Sci. 2020; 190(2):825-834.

PMID: 32886296 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02340-1.


High-risk Corneal Transplantation: Recent Developments and Future Possibilities.

Armitage W, Goodchild C, Griffin M, Gunn D, Hjortdal J, Lohan P Transplantation. 2019; 103(12):2468-2478.

PMID: 31765363 PMC: 6867666. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002938.


Risk Factors for Endothelial Decompensation after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

Liu M, Hong J J Ophthalmol. 2018; 2018:1389486.

PMID: 30581601 PMC: 6276470. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1389486.


Outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty.

Khairallah A Saudi Med J. 2016; 37(9):1029-32.

PMID: 27570862 PMC: 5039603. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2016.9.14075.