» Articles » PMID: 26202019

Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Jul 24
PMID 26202019
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To obtain detailed information on the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) METHODS: A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on the use of RSA in RA patients from 1990 to 2014. The inclusion criteria were a report of sufficient information on pre-operative status and surgical outcome allowing evaluation of the therapeutic potential of RSA in RA. The literature search resulted in 586 hits, but only five studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed.

Results: There were 100 shoulders that had been operated on, of which 87 were followed for a mean of 55.4 months, the longest follow-up being 11.9 years Most patients had glenohumeral erosive lesions of Larsen Grade III or IV. The Delta III prosthesis was implanted in most cases and in three studies bone graft was used for severe glenoid lesions. The main outcome measures employed were the Constant score (Cs) and ASES questionnaire. The mean increase in Cs and ASES score after surgery was 42.4 and 54 points, respectively. The mean post-operative forward elevation was 120.6°, the average increment being 51° and the mean increase of abduction was 58.5°. The mean prevalence of scapular notching was 35.4 %. The rate of adverse events was 31 %, but the vast majority were of minor severity. Eight prostheses underwent revision, due to infection in four.

Conclusions: RSA implanted in RA patients would appear to give similar results to those obtained in massive cuff tears with or without arthropathy.

Citing Articles

Role of the Gut Microbiota in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Spondylarthritis: An Update on the Gut-Joint Axis.

Longo U, Lalli A, Bandini B, De Sire R, Angeletti S, Lustig S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542216 PMC: 10970477. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063242.


Outcome of a metaphyseal reverse total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Consigliere P, Witney-Lagen C, Natera L, Sforza G, Bruguera J, Abraham R Musculoskelet Surg. 2021; 106(3):257-268.

PMID: 33783764 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-021-00706-x.


Midterm clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis using patient-reported outcome measures (Shoulder36).

Nagase Y, Naito M, Momoyama G, Uchida Y, Nishikawa T, Makabe K JSES Int. 2021; 5(1):114-120.

PMID: 33554176 PMC: 7846690. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.016.


Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early Outcomes, Pitfalls, and Challenges.

He Y, Xiao L, Zhai W, Xu Y Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(5):1380-1387.

PMID: 32803918 PMC: 7670150. DOI: 10.1111/os.12769.


Patient-reported outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative risk factor analysis of improved versus unimproved cases.

Parsons M, Routman H, Roche C, Friedman R JSES Open Access. 2019; 3(3):174-178.

PMID: 31709358 PMC: 6834991. DOI: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.004.


References
1.
Lehtinen J, Belt E, Lyback C, Kauppi M, Kaarela K, Kautiainen H . Subacromial space in the rheumatoid shoulder: a radiographic 15-year follow-up study of 148 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9(3):183-7. View

2.
Walch G, Boileau P, Noel E . Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Joint Bone Spine. 2010; 77(6):501-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.09.004. View

3.
Baulot E, Garron E, Grammont P . [Grammont prosthesis in humeral head osteonecrosis. Indications--results]. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999; 65 Suppl 1:109-15. View

4.
Nolan B, Ankerson E, Wiater J . Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(9):2476-82. PMC: 3148381. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1683-z. View

5.
Cuff D, Pupello D, Virani N, Levy J, Frankle M . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(6):1244-51. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00775. View